Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 2020 May 30;176:108170. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108170

Figure 4. MAGL inhibition does not alter LiCl induced aversion, or palatable-food reward.

Figure 4.

(A) Food CPP; mice were treated either with pellet or cheesecake. Mice treated with palatable food (cheesecake) showed significant preference score compared to their pellet counterparts. Pretreatment with JZL184 (24 mg/kg i.p.) did not alter food reward. (B) LiCl-induced CPP; mice were treated either with vehicle or LiCl (150 mg/kg i.p.). Mice treated with LiCl showed significant aversion score compared to their vehicle counterparts. Pretreatment with JZL184 (24 mg/kg i.p.) did not alter LiCl aversion. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of 8–10 mice/group. *p<0.05 vs all treatment groups.