Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2020 Jul 22;107(6):1226–1238.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.030

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Repetition suppression analyses. Left: When one of the eight hubs was presented randomly following F2 presentation, as subjects performed a cover task (F3 presentation), BOLD contrast of task-irrelevant hub (Non-relevant hub) > H2, displayed at p<0.005 uncorrected (no masking is applied to the image). The HC effect is significant at pTFCE<0.05 corrected in an independent anatomically defined bilateral HC ROI. Right: beta estimates from an independently defined right HC ROI (see Fig. 1B). The activity in the right HC differed significantly according to which type of hub was shown at F3 presentation (Wilks’ =.553, F2,25=10.11, p=0.001, repeated-measures ANOVA). Activity in the right HC was suppressed when the relevant hub (H2) was presented, compared to matched Non-relevant hubs (p<0.001). No suppression was found when the hub inferred from F1 (H1) was presented (p>0.05; See Fig. S4 for additional confirmatory analyses).