Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;11:541659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.541659

Table 2B.

Demographic, clinical, cognitive, functioning profiles of “Better” and “Poorer” clusters.

Variables HC & Baseline FEPa HC & Follow-Up FEPb Baseline & Follow-Up FEPc
Cluster 1: Better functioning (N = 16) Cluster 2: Poorer functioning (N = 37) Cluster 1: Better functioning (N = 40) Cluster 2: Poorer functioning (N = 11) Cluster 1: Better functioning (N = 27) Cluster 2: Poorer functioning (N = 11)
Patients
(count, %)
5
(31.25%)
15 (40.54%) 12 (30.00%) 6
(54.55%)
N/A N/A
Schizophrenia
(count, %)
N/A N/A N/A N/A 8
(29.63%)
8
(72.73%)
Age 24.44
(4.6)
22.14
(4.6)
23.08
(3.8)
23.09
(3.8)
22.67
(3.0)
23.91
(3.0)
Females
(count, %)
6
(37.50%)
13 (35.14%) 14 (35.00%) 4
(36.36%)
10 (37.04%) 3
(27.27%)
Education (years) 16.31
(1.8)
14.89
(1.8)
15.38
(1.7)
15.36
(1.7)
14.89
(1.2)
15.27
(1.2)
UPSA 80.99
(9.8)
82.59
(9.8)
83.57
(9.0)
81.07
(9.0)
81.2
(12.8)
81.44
(12.8)
MCAS 52.21
(4.3)
51.88
(4.3)
52.94
(4.3)
49.22
(4.3)
49.33
(7.3)
44.6
(7.3)
MCAS Independent Subscore 9.75
(0.8)
9.31
(0.8)
9.5
(1.3)
8.0
(1.3)
8.61
(2.1)
6.78
(2.1)
MCAS
Social Subscore
18.94
(2.0)
18.83
(2.0)
19.39
(1.6)
17.88
(1.6)
17.91
(3.4)
15.56
(3.4)
MATRICS Social Subscore 54.5
(8.7)
54.03
(8.7)
55.41
(8.2)
52.0
(8.2)
57.0
(14.2)
45.75
(14.2)
MATRICS Neurocognitive
Composite Score
50.3
(5.1)
48.27
(5.1)
50.66
(5.0)
46.78
(5.0)
48.11
(9.3)
44.52
(9.3)
TASIT 55.25
(6.0)
54.87
(6.0)
56.03
(4.3)
52.62
(4.3)
54.87
(6.5)
52.12
(6.5)
PANSS Positive N/A N/A N/A N/A 13.33
(6.2)
15.3
(6.2)
PANSS Negative N/A N/A N/A N/A 11.15
(3.6)
12.6
(3.6)
PANSS General N/A N/A N/A N/A 27.81
(7.2)
31.5
(7.2)
PANSS Total N/A N/A N/A N/A 52.3
(15.6)
59.4
(15.6)

Note 1: means with standard deviations in parentheses. Note 2: Higher values indicate better functioning in UPSA/MCAS/MCAS-Independent/MCAS-Social/MATRICS-Social/MATRICS Neurocognitive/TASIT measures. Higher values indicate more symptomatic in PANSS Positive/PANSS Negative/PANSS General/PANSS Total measures. Note 3: aBaseline measures for both HC and FEP subjects were used; bBaseline measures were used for HC and follow-up measures were used for patients; cBaseline measures were used for baseline patients and follow-up measures were used for follow-up patients. Note 4: Significant difference between the two cluster means (p-value < 0.05) was shown in bold.