Table 3B.
Demographic, clinical, cognitive, functioning profiles of “Better” and “Poorer” clusters.
| Variables | FEP (Change in MMN)d | |
|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1: Better functioning (N = 10) | Cluster 2: Poorer functioning (N = 8) | |
| Schizophrenia (count, %) | 5 (50.00%) | 3 (37.50%) |
| Age | 23.4 (3.5) | 23.38 (3.5) |
| Females (count,%) | 4 (40.00%) | 2 (25.00%) |
| Education (years) | 14.9 (1.8) | 15.25 (1.8) |
| UPSA | 88.23 (14.6) | 75.19 (14.6) |
| MCAS | 49.33 (5.7) | 46.5 (5.7) |
| MCAS Independent Subscore | 8.0 (1.5) | 6.5 (1.5) |
| MCAS Social Subscore | 17.67 (2.1) | 16.67 (2.1) |
| MATRICS Social Subscore | 59.0 (16.1) | 51.14 (16.1) |
| MATRICS Neurocognitive Composite Score |
50.0 (10.6) | 46.81 (10.6) |
| TASIT | 55.89 (5.7) | 52.83 (5.7) |
| PANSS Positive | 12.0 (5.3) | 14.5 (5.3) |
| PANSS Negative | 10.33 (3.7) | 10.5 (3.7) |
| PANSS General | 23.56 (8.2) | 30.25 (8.2) |
| PANSS Total | 45.89 (15.9) | 55.25 (15.9) |
Note 1: means with standard deviations in parentheses unless otherwise specified. Note 2: dIndividual’s follow-up measures were used.