Table 1.
MR methods assessed in this study.
MR method | Data required | Pleiotropy correction | LD correction | Minimum no. of IVs required |
---|---|---|---|---|
MR-link | Sumstats: E; ILD: O | Yes | Yes | 1 |
Inverse variance weighted (IVW)28 | Sumstats: O, E | No | No | 1 |
LDA-MR-Egger17 | Sumstats: O, E, LDR | Yes | Yes | 3 |
MR-Egger18 | Sumstats: O, E | Yes | No | 3 |
MR-PRESSOa,19 | Sumstats: O, E | Yes | No | 3a |
MR methods assessed in our simulation with information about the type of data needed to make a causal estimate, the ability to correct for pleiotropy or linkage disequilibrium, and the minimum number of instrumental variables required.
IVW inverse variance weighting, Sumstats summary statistics, ILD individual-level data, O outcome, E exposure, LDR linkage disequilibrium reference panel. For more details, see “Methods”.
aWe refer here to the MR-PRESSO test that reports estimates after identifying and removing outliers, as the test without outliers generalizes to IVW estimates.