Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;11:4930. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18716-x

Table 1.

MR methods assessed in this study.

MR method Data required Pleiotropy correction LD correction Minimum no. of IVs required
MR-link Sumstats: E; ILD: O Yes Yes 1
Inverse variance weighted (IVW)28 Sumstats: O, E No No 1
LDA-MR-Egger17 Sumstats: O, E, LDR Yes Yes 3
MR-Egger18 Sumstats: O, E Yes No 3
MR-PRESSOa,19 Sumstats: O, E Yes No 3a

MR methods assessed in our simulation with information about the type of data needed to make a causal estimate, the ability to correct for pleiotropy or linkage disequilibrium, and the minimum number of instrumental variables required.

IVW inverse variance weighting, Sumstats summary statistics, ILD individual-level data, O outcome, E exposure, LDR linkage disequilibrium reference panel. For more details, see “Methods”.

aWe refer here to the MR-PRESSO test that reports estimates after identifying and removing outliers, as the test without outliers generalizes to IVW estimates.