Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;11:1054. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01054

Table 3.

Characteristics of subjects who were outliers on their GFAP difference scores.

Age Gender Mechanism of injury Injury to blood sampling (hours) CT result GOS-E outcome Plasma GFAP (pg/mL) Serum GFAP (pg/mL) GFAP difference (plasma – serum)
80 Male GLF 1.3 Abnormal Poor 1,001.8 2,613.8 −1,612.0*
89 Female GLF 2.9 Abnormal Poor 243.5 1,064.1 −820.6*
75 Male Sport 7.2 Not Done Poor 4,420.0 4,813.8 −393.8
88 Female GLF 4.5 Abnormal Poor 886.4 492.6 393.8
92 Female GLF 1.4 Abnormal Poor 630.2 188.6 441.6
89 Female GLF 4.8 Abnormal Poor 1,863.0 1,372.2 490.7
81 Female GLF 3.8 Normal Poor 1,288.3 788.3 500.0
83 Female Fall 5.3 Abnormal Poor 1,941.2 1,382.7 558.5
77 Male GLF 2.9 Abnormal Poor 1,792.7 1,191.1 601.5
61 Male GLF 5.1 Abnormal Poor 1,490.1 846.6 643.4
89 Female GLF 3.6 Normal Poor 4,027.7 3,382.4 645.3
68 Female Fall 3.3 Abnormal Poor 2,857.2 2,057.9 799.3*
95 Male GLF 5.9 Abnormal Poor 3,152.8 2,341.0 811.8*
69 Male GLF 3.1 Normal Good 1,283.3 218.4 1,064.8*
78 Female GLF 5.4 Normal Poor 1,651.9 323.2 1,328.7*
72 Male GLF 3.8 Abnormal Poor 4,296.4 2,212.9 2,083.5*
89 Female GLF 8.3 Abnormal Poor 6,838.6 2,640.7 4,197.8*
M = 2,333.2 M = 1,643.0 M = 690.3
Md = 1,792.7 Md = 1,372.2 Md = 601.5

Outliers were defined as GFAP difference values that were >1.5 times the IQR. Extreme outliers (GFAP difference values >3 times the IQR) are denoted with an asterisk. CT, computed tomography; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GLF, ground-level fall; GOS-E, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.