Table. Classification Accuracy of the Conventional Deep Learning Models on Adversarial Examples Crafted by the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) Using InceptionV3.
Model | Accuracy of deep learning models, %a | ||
---|---|---|---|
InceptionV3 | MobileNetV2 | ResNet50 | |
Fundus photography | |||
No attack | 89.1 | 88.6 | 89.9 |
FGSM using the InceptionV3 modela | 13.4 | 63.7 | 77.5 |
Ultrawide-field fundus photography | |||
No attack | 97.6 | 97.4 | 96.8 |
FGSM using the InceptionV3 modelb | 5.0 | 74.3 | 72.1 |
Optical coherence tomography | |||
No attack | 99.6 | 99.5 | 99.6 |
FGSM using the InceptionV3 modelb | 8.2 | 68.8 | 64.8 |
The results were derived from the validation dataset.
Perturbation coefficient ε = 0.010.