TABLE 2.
Envisioned application | Polymer and construct | Embedded phage | Relevant results |
Reference | |||
Study type | Manufacturing process and Protective properties | Phage release | Antimicrobial effects | ||||
Protection of phage against acidic gastric environment | Microcapsules of anionic methacrylic acid and methyl methacrylate copolymer (Eudragit® S100) and trehalose. | S. enterica phage Felix O1 | In vitro | Phages exposed to high temperatures during spray drying (100–180°C) with low titer loss. Copolymer: trehalose (2:1 ratio) showed high phage loading and acid resistance. Dry storage (RT, 3 months) caused 1log10 titer reduction. | Encapsulation of 109 PFU/gram was achieved. Presence of trehalose prevented a 4log10 reduction observed for copolymer formulations. | Not assessed | Vinner et al., 2019 |
Food preservation by incorporation in packaging material | Hollow fibers mats of poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) and cellulose diacetate (CDA) blends. | E. coli phage T4 | In vitro | PEO and CDA were dissolved in 98:2 wt% chloroform/methanol. Fiber mats were fabricated by coaxial electrospinning. Fiber diameter range 1.35–2.47 μm, containing internalized phage. | Higher PEO MW equals slower phage release kinetics. Increase of hydrophobic CDA slows fiber swelling and thus phage release kinetics. | Not assessed | Korehei and Kadla, 2014 |
Treatment of bacterial lung infections | W1/O/W2 Microparticles of PLGA and Pluronic 92L, fabricated by W/O/W emulsions | S. aureus phage and an isolated P. aeruginosa phage | In vitro | W1: 1% aqueous solution of Pluronic 92L, O: 5% PLGA solution in DCM, W2: 1% aqueous PVA solution. Both W1 and W2 contained phage. Emulsions were mixed by homogenizer. Microparticles were frozen in liquid N2 and lyophilized without cryoprotectants. | Encapsulated phage in W1 did not efficiently release. W1 and W2 combined phage release reached 15% and 25% of encapsulated S. aureus and P. aeruginosa phage, respectively. | Lytic activity of both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa phage prevented bacterial lawn formation after 1- or 3-days storage at room temperature. No PFU observed after 7 days dry storage at 4°C or RT. | Puapermpoonsiri et al., 2009 |
Treatment of root canal infections | Poloxamer P407 hydrogel (30% w/v) | E. faecalis phages EFDG1 and EFLK1 | In vivo | 30% poloxamer P407 solution was made by directly dissolving the polymers in the phage cocktail dispersion (109 PFU/mL). | Hydrogel gelation occurred in 2–3 min after incubation at 37°C. Released phage gradually decreased over 28 days (from 108 PFU/mL to 104 PFU/mL). | In vitro CFU reduction of 3–4log10 reduction against biofilm cultures. In vivo efficacy in a rat model was proven against a 4-week old root canal infection (2log10 CFU reduction) and was superior to a single 109 PFU/mL administration of unembedded phage (1.5log10 CFU reduction). | Shlezinger et al., 2019 |
Study type | Manufacturing process and Protective properties | Phage release | Antimicrobial effects | ||||
Delivery of phage to the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients | Hollow microparticles of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) | Multiple P. aeruginosa phages | In vivo | Porous PLGA microparticles with phage loading after particle formation. Phage load of 2.6⋅106 PFU/mg particle. Dry powder formulation by lyophilizing particles in lactose solutions. | Inhibitory zone of P. aeruginosa around phage loaded PLGA particles was microscopically observed, indicating phage release from the PLGA microparticle. | In vitro biofilm CFU reduction of 2.5log10. Mice inoculated with P. aeruginosa were treated by particle inhalation resulting in a 1.5log10 reduction of CFU compared to free phage administration. Survival rate upon treatment was 100% versus 13% for untreated control mice. | Agarwal et al., 2018 |
Prophylactic phage and antibiotic delivery on orthopedic implants (K-wires) | Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) coating on K-wires | MRSA phage MR-5 | In vitro | 2% and 4% HPMC solutions containing phage and/or linezolid were used for dip coating the K-wires. | From 2% HPMC coatings, release was observed for 48 h. For 4% HPMC coatings a release period of 96 h was reached. | Reduction of 3log10 of CFU adhered to the K-wire with HPMC-phage coating. Additive effect between linezolid and phage was evident (>4log10 reduction of adhered CFU) after 48 h. | Kaur et al., 2014 |
Prophylactic phage and antibiotic delivery on orthopedic implants (K-wires) | Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) coating on K-wires | MRSA phage MR-5 | In vivo | 4% HPMC solutions containing phage and/or linezolid were used for dip coating the K-wires. | In vivo release of phage was not tested. Outcome based on CFU reduction. | Bacterial load diminished fastest for antibiotics/phage combination. Phage, antibiotic and combined loaded HPMC coating resulted no CFU observed in the soft tissue surrounding the implant. | Kaur et al., 2016 |
Treatment of orthopedic infections | Hydrogel of 4-armed polyethylene glycol (PEG) functionalized with crosslinking moieties |
P. aeruginosa phages ΦPaer4/ ΦPaer14. S. aureus phage ΦK |
In vivo | 4 arms of the PEG macromers were functionalized with crosslinkers or tissue adhesive peptides. | Phage release dictated by enzymatic hydrogel degradation. In presence of collagenase, 50% phage release observed in 8 h. | In vitro anti-biofilm experiments resulting in a 1log10 reduction in CFU. In vivo, a 0.5log10 reduction in CFU was observed 7 days after phage/hydrogel treatment. | Bean et al., 2014 |
Abbreviations - CDA: cellulose diacetate; CFU: Colony-forming unit; DCM: Dichloromethane; HPMC: Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; MRSA: Multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; PEG: Poly(ethylene glycol); PEO: Poly(ethylene oxide); PFU: Plaque-forming unit; PLGA: Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); PVA: Poly(vinyl alcohol); RT: Room temperature.