Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;35(6):313–321. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000328

Table 1.

Mean baseline and least squares mean change and treatment difference between pimavanserin and placebo for study outcomes

Stage 1 Stage 2
Placebo Pimavanserin Placebo Pimavanserin
HAMD anxiety/somatization factor at baseline N = 152 N = 51 N = 29 N = 29
Baseline mean (SE) 6.6 (0.18) 6.9 (0.36) 6.0 (0.43) 6.5 (0.49)
Change from baseline to week 5
 LS mean (SE)a −2.1 (0.21) −3.7 (0.36) −0.6 (0.35) −0.6 (0.33)
 95% CI of LS mean (−2.5 to −1.7) (−4.4 to −3.0) (−1.3 to 0.1) (−1.3 to 0.0)
 LS mean (SE) difference (pimavanserin 34 mg-placebo) −1.5 (0.41) 0 (0.48)
  95% CI of difference (−2.4 to −0.7) (−1.0 to 1.0)
P-valueb 0.0003 0.980
 Effect size (Cohen’s d) 0.634 −0.007
Overall treatment comparison at week 5 (linear combination test)
 Weighted difference in LS mean (SE) −0.8 (0.32)
 95% CI of weighted difference (−1.4 to −0.1)
P-valueb 0.0166
HAMD anxiety/somatization factor ≥7 at baseline N = 76 N = 29 N = 18 N = 19
 Baseline mean (SE) 8.5 (0.15) 8.8 (0.28) 7.1 (0.54) 7.5 (0.59)
Change from baseline to week 5
 LS mean (SE)a −2.8 (0.35) −5.0 (0.56) −1.5 (0.49) −1.3 (0.44)
 95% CI of LS mean (−3.5 to −2.1) (−6.1 to −3.8) (−2.5 to −0.5) (−2.3 to −0.4)
 LS Mean (SE) difference (pimavanserin 34 mg-placebo) −2.2 (0.66) 0.1 (0.66)
 95% CI of difference (−3.5 to −0.9) (−1.2 to 1.5)
P-valueb 0.0013 0.847
 Effect size (Cohen’s d) 0.781 −0.067
Overall treatment comparison at week 5 (linear combination test)
 Weighted difference in LS mean (SE) −1.0 (0.47)
 95% CI of weighted difference (−2.0 to −0.1)
P-valueb 0.027
HAMD total score ≥24 and HAMD anxiety/somatization factor ≥7 at baseline N = 36 N = 17 N = 8 N = 10
 Baseline mean (SE) 27.6 (0.41) 27.6 (0.70) 24.0 (1.20) 22.0 (1.90)
Change from baseline to week 5
 LS mean (SE)a −9.3 (1.40) −17.4 (1.97) −1.3 (1.68) −3.7 (1.43)
 95% CI of LS mean (−12.1 to −6.5) −21.4 to −13.4) (−4.9 to 2.3) −6.8 to −0.6)
 LS mean (SE) difference (pimavanserin 34 mg-placebo) −8.1 (2.42) −2.4 (2.22)
 95% CI of difference (−13.0 to −3.2) (−7.2 to 2.3)
P-valueb 0.0018 0.295
 Effect size (Cohen’s d) 1.037 0.536
Overall treatment comparison at week 5 (linear combination test)
 Weighted difference in LS mean (SE) −5.2 (1.64)
 95% CI of weighted difference −8.5 to −2.0)
P-valueb 0.0014

ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval; HAMD, Hamilton depression rating scale; LS, least squares; SE, standard errors.

a

LS mean from the stage-specific ANCOVA analysis with the change from baseline as the outcome, treatment group as a factor, and the corresponding baseline value as a covariate.

b

Two-sided P-value for treatment difference from the stage-specific ANCOVA analysis.