Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;12:9173–9182. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S269893

Table 2.

Difference in Clinical Characteristics and Dosimetry Between IMRT and 3D-CRT Groups

RT Techniques p value
3DRT IMRT
Patients 134 (100%) 174 (100%)
BMI 0.756
 ≤24 64 (47.8%) 80 (46.0%)
 >24 70 (52.2%) 94 (54.0%)
Surgery type 0.140
 BCS 89 (66.4%) 129 (74.1%)
 Mastectomy 45 (33.6%) 45 (25.9%)
Nodal irradiation 0.885
 No 79 (59.0%) 104 (59.8%)
 Yes 55 (41.0%) 70 (40.2%)
Skin toxicity <0.001*
 < grade 2 99 (73.9%) 156 (89.7%)
 ≥ grade 2 35 (26.1%) 18 (10.3%)
Dosimetry (mean±SD)
 CTV-V95% 98.6±0.1% 99±0.1% 0.009*
 PTV-V95% 94.5±0.2% 95.2±0.1% 0.001*
TV-V105% 7.8±0.5% 2.9±0.2% <0.001*
 <5.7% 53 (39.6%) 151 (86.8%) <0.001*
 ≥5.7% 81 (60.4%) 23 (13.2%)
TV-V107% 1.2±0.2% 0.2±0.03% <0.001*
 <1% 90 (67.2%) 152 (87.4%) 0.001*
 ≥1% 44 (32.8%) 22 (12.6%)

Notes: *Statistical significance. V105% and V107%=percent volume receiving 105% and 107% of the prescribed dose.

Abbreviations: BCS, breast-conserving surgery; BMI, body mass index; TV, treatment volume.