Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 12;2020:8357237. doi: 10.1155/2020/8357237

Table 1.

Main effect of intrarow spacing on yield and yield components of tomato at Shewarobit

MFY (kg ha−1) UMFY (kg ha−1) NMF NUMF FD (cm) No. branch DTF (days)
Intra‐row spacing
20 cm 6992a 756.56 155525 138.1 4.78b 7.67 44.08
30 cm 4477b 858.80 110747 148.8 5.39a 8.17 44.33
40 cm 4419b 892.31 98239 122.8 5.05ab 7.00 44.33
Sig. level ns ns ns ns ns
CV (%) 49 51 54 54 10.8 33.8 9.4

Inter‐row spacing
60 cm 7674a 3961.0a 207529a 198.3a 4.5189c 44.8 7.1
80 cm 5840ab 3701.5ab 122558ab 153.2ab 4.8733bc 44.7 6.6
100 cm 3848b 2024.9b 83003b 103.7b 5.7067a 43.9 7
120 cm 3821b 1749.4b 72924b 91.1b 5.0589b 43.7 6.9
Sign. level ∗∗ ns ns

CV (%) 49 51 54 54 10.8 9.4 7.8

Means in columns with the same letter(s) in each treatment are not significantly different, UMF: unmarketable fruit yield; NMF: number of marketable fruit; NUMF: number of unmarketable fruit yield; FD: fruit diameter; No. branch: number of primary branches; PH = plant height; FL = fruit length; DTF: days to first flowering.