Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;22(9):e19358. doi: 10.2196/19358

Table 2.

Reasons for failed tablet uptake and completion.

Reasons All visits, n (%) Clinic 1 visits, n (%) Clinic 2 visits, n (%) P value
Reasons tablet not offered to patients 385 (100) 264 (100) 121 (100) <.001a

Patient missed by research assistant 307 (79.7) 215 (81.4) 92 (76.0)

Technology-related issueb 48 (12.5) 38 (14.4) 10 (8.3)

Both tablets already in use 12 (3.1) 7 (2.7) 5 (4.1)

Not documented 18 (4.7) 4 (1.5) 14 (11.6)
Reasons tablet not accepted by patients when offered 439 (100) 385 (100) 54 (100) .70c

Patient refusal (denies asthma diagnosis) 54 (12.3) 46 (12.0) 8 (14.8)

Patient refusal (indicates too difficult to use) 24 (5.5) 22 (5.7) 2 (3.7)

Patient refusal (no reason provided) 351 (80.0) 307 (79.7) 44 (81.5)

Caregiver refusal 10 (2.3) 10 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
Reasons questionnaire not completed when tablet accepted 107 (100) 81 (100) 26 (100) <.001c

Patient aborted (no reason provided) 46 (43.0) 45 (55.5) 1 (3.9)

Patient aborted (indicates too difficult to complete) 17 (15.9) 8 (9.9) 9 (34.6)

Patient aborted (started, then denied asthma diagnosis) 11 (10.3) 6 (7.4) 5 (19.2)

Technology-related issueb 5 (4.7) 2 (2.5) 3 (11.5)

Clinician aborted (called patient in prior to finishing) 28 (26.1) 20 (24.7) 8 (30.8)

aChi-square test was used.

bTechnology-related issues included poor Wi-Fi or network connectivity and tablet software or hardware malfunctions.

cFisher exact test was used.