Table 5.
Contextual construct | CES |
CarerQoL |
ASCOT-Carer |
EQ-5D-5L (carer) |
ICECAP-A |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | CC | Effect size | CC | Effect size | CC | Effect size | CC | Effect size | CC | Effect size | |
Carer | |||||||||||
Age | 558 | −0.02 | 0.06 | −0.01 | −0.15∗∗∗ | 0.01 | |||||
Gender, female | 569 | −0.18∗ | −0.23∗∗ | −0.16 | −0.01 | −0.06 | |||||
Employment status, paid employment | 567 | 0.25∗∗ | 0.23∗∗ | 0.17 | 0.38∗∗∗ | 0.22∗∗ | |||||
Self-rated life satisfaction | 564 | 0.52∗∗∗ | 0.64∗∗∗ | 0.78∗∗∗ | 0.43∗∗∗ | 0.82∗∗∗ | |||||
Care recipient | |||||||||||
Age | 546 | 0.10∗ | 0.15∗∗ | 0.17∗∗∗ | 0.14∗∗ | 0.23∗∗∗ | |||||
Gender, male | 574 | −0.06 | −0.27∗∗ | −0.22∗ | −0.19∗ | −0.30∗∗∗ | |||||
Cognitive difficulties and daily dependencies | 576 | −0.14∗∗∗ | −0.35∗∗∗ | −0.39∗∗∗ | −0.18∗∗∗ | −0.38∗∗∗ | |||||
Health status (EQ-5D-5L) | 503 | 0.15∗∗∗ | 0.30∗∗∗ | 0.32∗∗∗ | 0.24∗∗∗ | 0.32∗∗∗ | |||||
Direction of health status, declining | 569 | −0.34∗∗∗ | −0.34∗∗∗ | −0.29∗∗ | −0.17∗ | −0.24∗∗ | |||||
Caring situation | |||||||||||
Co-residence | 575 | −0.49∗∗∗ | −0.33∗∗∗ | −0.62∗∗∗ | −0.40∗∗∗ | −0.63∗∗∗ | |||||
Relationship, spouse | 576 | −0.21∗ | −0.16 | −0.35∗∗∗ | −0.37∗∗∗ | −0.46∗∗∗ | |||||
Duration of caring (months) | 568 | −0.10∗ | −0.14∗∗∗ | −0.17∗∗∗ | −0.12∗∗ | −0.21∗∗∗ | |||||
Hours of care per week >20 | 559 | −0.58∗∗∗ | −0.62∗∗ | 0.94∗∗∗ | −0.45∗∗∗ | −0.86∗∗∗ | |||||
Provides personal care | 508 | −0.31∗∗ | −0.47∗∗∗ | −0.64∗∗∗ | −0.42∗∗∗ | −0.61∗∗ | |||||
Main carer | 566 | −0.59∗∗∗ | −0.49∗∗∗ | −0.62∗∗∗ | −0.34∗∗∗ | −0.57∗∗∗ | |||||
Involvement of others | 566 | 0.44∗∗∗ | 0.21∗ | 0.22∗ | 0.13 | 0.22∗∗ |
Note. CC indicates correlation coefficient. Spearman’s rho is reported for all constructs that are continuous variables (age, self-rated life satisfaction, number of cognitive difficulties and daily dependencies, recipient EQ-5D-5L, duration of caring). Cohen’s d effect size is reported for all other variables. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients of >0.3 are considered weak, >0.5 moderate, and >0.7 strong. Cohen’s d effect sizes of >0.2 are considered small, >0.5 moderate, and >0.8 large. The same interpretations apply for negative correlation coefficients and effect sizes. Yellow shading indicates not statistically significant; light yellow shading, statistically significant, small/weak effect size; dark yellow shading, statistically significant, moderate/high/strong effect size.
P<.05;
P<.01;
P<.001.