Table 4.

Keratoconus Probability Prediction of Subclinical Keratoconus Cases^a by VGG16 and Comparing With Topographic, Tomographic, and Tonometry Indexes

		TMS Indexes (Topography)		Pentacam (Tomography)	Corvis (Tonometry)
Case No.	Probability of keratoconus (%)	KCI	KSI	BAD-D	CBI
1	97%	15.7%	35%	0.23	0
2	89%	24.2%	37.5%	0.22	0
3	89%	29.3%	29.4%	0.5	0.07
4	81%	0%	0%	2.75	0.67
5	73%	23.8%	31.7%	3.03	0.08
6	67%	34.3%	22.3%	0.19	0
7	64%	0%	0%	0.5	0
8	55%	0%	0%	2.1	0.02
9	44%	41.2%	37.2%	0.36	0
10	37%	0%	19.3%	0.64	0
11	36%	26.5%	31.7%	1.81	0.82
12	20%	0%	0%	0.94	0
13	14%	0%	15.3%	0.49	0.06
14	12%	0%	0%	2.82	1
15	10%	0%	0%	0.92	0
16	7%	0%	0%	1.83	0.03
17	4%	0%	20.8%	1.84	0.05
18	4%	0%	0%	1.27	0.05
19	3%	0%	0%	1.57	0.07
20	3%	0%	0%	0.91	0
21	2%	0%	15.5%	1.61	0.25
22	1%	0%	20%	2.37	0
23	1%	0%	17.9%	2.11	0
24	1%	0%	17.4%	1.62	0.01
25	1%	0%	15.8%	2.38	0
26	0%	0%	0%	2.01	0.9
27	0%	0%	0%	1.79	0.71
28	0%	0%	17.9%	1.87	0.23

^aThe ground truth of subclinical keratoconus was based on topographic pattern interpreted by clinicians.