Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 20;43(5):633–641. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1696076

Table 2. Neuropsychological test performance by group.

  Tetraplegia Paraplegia HC F Value
Performance Validity
WAIS-III Reliable Digit Span Score 9.77 (2.01) 9.36 (2.02) 9.67 (1.86) 0.34, ns
Learning & Memory
CVLT Total Recall across 5 trials (T) 46.65 (14.10) 45.24 (8.90) 53.93 (11.98) 2.90, P = 0.06
CVLT SDFR (z) –0.18 (1.02) –0.76 (1.15) 0.3 (1.01) 5.76, P = 0.004
CVLT LDFR (z) –0.48 (1.3) –0.62 (1.09) 0.1 (1.11) 2.06, ns
Working Memory / Processing Speed
Digit Span ss 9.30 (2.83) 9.14 (2.72) 9.9 (2.35) 0.30, ns
Letter Number Sequencing ss 9.68 (2.57) 9.52 (3.20) 9.67 (1.58) 0.01, ns
SDMT z score –1.52 (0.77) –1.04 (1.19) –0.59 (1.11) 5.18, P = 0.008
PASAT Total –0.87 (1.02) –1.14 (1.09) –0.36 (0.85) 1.99, ns
Executive Control
Letter Fluency 9.63 (2.61) 8.83 (3.23) 11.87 (3.12) 3.85, P = 0.03
Category Fluency 9.17 (3.62) 9.45 (3.43) 11.67 (3.26) 1.53, ns
Stroop–Color Naming 8.60 (3.04) 9.07 (2.32) 9.17 (2.31) 0.94, ns
Stroop-Word Reading 9.13 (2.47) 9.21 (3.11) 10.43 (2.0) 1.78, ns
Stroop Inhibition 9.80 (3.21) 9.43 (4.07) 10.93 (1.86) 0.96, ns

*Peach shading denotes pairwise significant difference between shaded groups; significant differences are noted in SCI group (paraplegia, tetraplegia) vs HC; no significant differences were noted between the 2 SCI groups directly. F value is reported for omnibus statistical test.