. 2019 Oct 11;43(5):657–666. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1671076

Table 4. Feasibility: compliance and intensity.

Participant	Compliance*	6MWT Longest distance, m	6MWT Longest distance gait speed, m/s^†	Lowest %SA achieved^‡	Sessions using SA^§
1	67%	–	–	85%	50%
2	67%	25	0.07	80%	100%
3	33%	29	0.08	61%	100%
4	6%	–	–	–	0%
5	67%	29	0.08	80%	50%
6	56%	45	0.13	77%	80%
7	100%	56	0.16	50%	100%
8	44%	50	0.14	70%	100%
9	83%	68	0.19	80%	100%
10	67%	48	0.13	68%	75%
11	44%	27	0.08	–	0%
12	17%	–	–	–	0%
Median	61%	45	0.13	77%	78%
(min, max)	(6%, 100%)	(25, 68)	(0.07, 0.19)	(50%, 85%)	(0%, 100%)
Mean	54%	42	0.12	72%	63%
(SD)	(30%)	(15.1)	(0.04)	(11%)	(42%)

6MWT, 6-Minute Walk Test; m, meter; s, second; SA, SmartAssist.

* Calculated as: $[(N o . o f E A W s e s s i o n c o m p l e t e d) \div (N o . o f e x p e c t e d s e s s i o n s)] \times 100 %$

^†Calculated as: $[(L o n g e s t d i s t a n c e f o r 6 M W T) \div (360 s)]$

^‡The lowest percentage of SmartAssist (SA) achieved, where SA is a function of total motor contribution toward walking. The device used was capable of unilateral control, however this was not differentiated, and the percentage reported is solely the lowest level of assistance required.

^§Calculated as: $[(N o . o f E A W s e s s i o n u s i n g S A) \div (N o . o f E A W s e s s i o n s)] \times 100 %$