Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;25(2):385–393. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy240

TABLE 3:

Comparison of Daily Frequency of Bowel Movements, Treatment Modalities, Endoscopic Features, and Clinical Outcomes Among Non-ICPI-Induced MC in Cancer Patients, ICPI-Induced MC in Cancer Patients, and Traditional MC in Noncancer Patients

Characteristic No. Patients (%) P
Non-ICPI-Induced MC With Cancer ICPI-Induced MC With Cancer Traditional MC Without Cancer
n = 39 n = 15 n = 11
Daily frequency of bowel movements 0.185
 ≤6 23 (59) 5 (33) 7 (64)
 >6 16 (41) 10 (67) 4 (36)
Colitis treatments 0.035
 Yes 25 (64) 14 (93) 10 (91)
 No 14 (36) 1 (7) 1 (9)
Colitis treatmentsa
 Antidiarrheals 5 (20) 7 (50) 1 (10) 0.052
 Aminosalicylates 4 (16) 4 (27) 4 (40) 0.310
 Budesonide 21 (84) 6 (43) 9 (90) 0.008
 Other oral steroids 0 (0) 12 (86) 1 (10) <0.001
 Intravenous steroids 0 (0) 5 (36) 0 (0) <0.001
 Infliximab/vedolizumab 1 (4) 8 (57) 0 (0) <0.001
Endoscopic featuresb 0.106
 Mucosal abnormality 5 (13) 7 (47) 3 (27)
 Tubular adenoma 6 (15) 4 (27) 0 (0)
 Both 2 (5) 0 (0) 1 (9)
 Normal 25 (64) 4 (27) 7 (64)
Clinical outcomes
 Recurrence 12 (31) 6 (40) 5 (46) 0.502
 Hospitalization 0 (0) 6 (40) 0 (0) <0.001
 Death 0 (0) 2 (13) 0 (0) 0.032

aSome patients required multiple colitis treatments. Percentages are out of the number treated.

bEndoscopic features are available for 38 of 39 non-ICPI-induced MC cancer patients.