Table 2.
Optimization of short guide RNA targeting murine Drd2 gene by Cel-I assay and off-target prediction in silico
| No. | Primers | Sequence | Strand | Domain | PAM | Cleavage efficiency (%) | Off target score (predicted) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forward | 5′-CACCGAAGATGTCACAGTGAATCCTG-3′ | – | TM3 | CTGAAT | 0.0 | 65.9 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACCAGGATTCACTGTGACATCTTC-3′ | ||||||
| 2 | Forward | 5′-CACCGCGGTGCAGAGTTTCATGTCCT-3′ | – | IC3 | CAGGGT | 0.0 | 74.4 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACAGGACATGAAACTCTGCACCGC-3′ | ||||||
| 3 | Forward | 5′-CACCGTTAGACTTCATGATAACGGTG-3′ | – | IC3 | CAGAGT | NA | 91.2 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACCACCGTTATCATGAAGTCTAAC-3′ | ||||||
| 4 | Forward | 5′-CACCGACCGTTATCATGAAGTCTAAT-3′ | + | IC3 | GGGAGT | NA | 89.1 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACATTAGACTTCATGATAACGGTC-3′ | ||||||
| 5 | Forward | 5′-CACCGGAGTTTCCCAGTGAACAGGCG-3′ | + | IC3 | GAGAAT | 5.1 | 84.6 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACCGCCTGTTCACTGGGAAACTCC-3′ | ||||||
| 6 | Forward | 5′-CACCGCATCGTACCAGGACAGGTTCA-3′ | – | N-term | GTGGAT | 3.7 | 88.8 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACTGAACCTGTCCTGGTACGATGC-3′ | ||||||
| 7 | Forward | 5′-CACCGAGAACTGGAGCCGGCCCTTCA-3′ | + | N-term | ATGGGT | 0.0 | 84.0 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACTGAAGGGCCGGCTCCAGTTCTC-3′ | ||||||
| 8 | Forward | 5′-CACCGAAAGACGATGATAAAGATGAG-3′ | – | TM1 | GAGGGT | 9.5 | 49.9 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACCTCATCTTTATCATCGTCTTTC-3′ | ||||||
| 9 | Forward | 5′-CACCGGGTGGCCACACTGGTTATGCC-3′ | + | TM2 | CTGGGT | 11.0 | 88.6 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACGGCATAACCAGTGTGGCCACCC-3′ | ||||||
| 10 | Forward | 5′-CACCGCACACGCTACAGCTCCAAGCG-3′ | + | IC2 | CCGAGT | 0.0 | 87.8 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACCGCTTGGAGCTGTAGCGTGTGC-3′ | ||||||
| 11 | Forward | 5′-CACCGTACTGTCATGATCGCCATTGT-3′ | + | TM4 | CTGGGT | 7.2 | 85.0 |
| Reverse | 5′-AAACACAATGGCGATCATGACAGTAC-3′ |