Table 1.
Demographic profile of patients in the four studies of PDS versus NACT-IDS.
Study | EORTC55971 | CHORUS | JCOG0602 | SCOPION |
---|---|---|---|---|
Year of publication | 2010 | 2015 | 2016† | 2016† |
Countries | Belgium, Canada, UK, Netherlands, Italy, Norway, and Spain | UK and New Zealand | Japan | Italy |
No. of patients | 336 vs 334 | 276 vs 274 | 149 vs 152 | 84 vs 87 |
Age (years) | 62 vs 63 | 66 vs 65 | 59 vs 60.5 | 54.8 vs 56.2 |
PS | ||||
0-1 | 294 (88) vs 290 (87) | 221 (80) vs 221 (81) | 130 (87) vs 131 (86) | 51 (93) vs 50 (91) |
2-3 | 40 (12) vs 44 (13) | 54 (20) vs 53 (19) | 19 (13) vs 21 (14) | 4 (7) vs 5 (9) |
Unknown | 2 (0.6) vs 0 | 1 vs 0 | 0 | 0 |
CA125 (U/ml) | 1130 vs 1180 | Not specified | Not specified | 2653 vs. 2100 |
Initial tumor size (cm) | ||||
Up to 2 cm | 4(1.2) vs 10(3) | 13(5) vs 15(5) | 32(22) vs 42(28) | Not specified |
>2-5 cm | 90(27) vs 85(25) | 59(21) vs 60(22) | 42(28) vs 51(34) | |
>5-10 cm | 90(27) vs88(26) | 111(40) vs 110(40) | 40(27) vs 35(23) | |
>10cm | 131(39) vs 137(41) | 86(32) vs 86(32) | 35(24) vs 24(16) | |
Unknown | 21(6.3) vs 14(4.2) | 7(3) vs 5(2) | 0 vs 0 | |
FIGO Stage | ||||
II | 0 vs. 0 | 12 (5) vs. 7 (3) | 0 vs 0 | 0 vs 0 |
III | 257 (77) vs. 253 (76) | 190 (78) vs.165 (80) | 100 (67) vs 105 (69) | 71 (85) vs 79 (91) |
IV | 77 (23) vs. 81 (24) | 41 (17) vs. 31 (15) | 49 (33) vs 47 (31) | 13 (16) vs 8 (9) |
Others | 2 (0.6) vs 0 | 12 vs 16 | 0 | 0 |
Histology | ** | |||
Serous | 220 (66) vs 194 (58) | 219 (86) vs 185 (85) | 116 (78) vs 110 (72) | 82 (98) vs 87 (100) |
Clear cell | 6(2) vs 4 (1.2) | 4 (2) vs 13 (6) | 12(8) vs 4 (3) | 1 (1.2) vs 0 |
Endometrioid | 11 (3) vs 5 (1.5) | 11 (4) vs 5 (2) | 6 (4) vs 4 (3) | 0 vs 0 |
Mucinous | 8 (2) vs 11 (3) | 2 (1) vs 4 (2) | 2 (1.4) vs 2 (1.5) | 0 vs 0 |
Others | 91 (27) vs 120 (36) | 19 (7) vs 12 (5) | 12 (8) vs 18 (13) | 1 (1.2) vs 0 |
Surgery | ||||
Operating time (min) | 165 vs 180 | 120 vs 120 | 341 vs 273 | 461 vs 253 |
Blood loss (ml) | Not specified | Not specified | 3447 vs 620 | Not specified |
Lymphadenectomy* | 26(8) vs 49(15) | 3(1) vs 1(0.5) | 29(20) vs 64(49) | 21(38) vs 7(14) |
Abdominal organs resected | 48(16) vs 28(9) | 27(12) vs 18(8) | 51(35) vs 33(25) | 83(99) vs 33(38) |
Complete surgery | 61(19) vs 151(51) | 39(17) vs 79(39) | 45(31) vs 83(64) | 40(48) vs 57(77) |
Optimal surgery | 131(42) vs 238(81) | 96(41) vs147(73) | 92(63) vs107(82) | 78(93) vs 74(100) |
Complications | ||||
G3-4 postoperative AEs | 68 (22) vs 21 (6.5) | 74 (29) vs 31 (14) | 24 (16) vs 7 (4.6) | 39 (46) vs 7 (9.5) |
G3-4 thromboembolism | 8 (3) vs 0 | 5 (2) vs 0 | 7 (5) vs 5 (3) | Not specified |
G3-4 infection | 25 (8.1) vs 5(2) | 16 (6) vs 8 (3) | 1 (0.7) vs 1 (0.8) | Not specified |
Postoperative death | 8 (2.5) vs 2(0.7) | 14 (6) vs1 (0.5) | 1 (0.7) vs 0 | 3 (3.6) vs 0 |
Chemotherapy | ||||
Carboplatin plus taxane | 243 (78) vs 283 (88) | 138 (61) vs 178 (70) | 148 (100) vs150 (100) | 50 (98) vs 52 (100) |
Platinum only | 25 (8) vs 20 (6) | 89 (39) vs 75 (30) | 0 vs 0 | 1(2) vs 0 |
Others | 21 (7) vs 19 (6) | 1(0.1) vs 1(0.1) | 0 vs 0 | 0 vs 0 |
Cycles | Not specified | |||
0 | 21 (7) vs 0 | 1 (1) vs 0 | 11 (7) vs 2 (1) | |
1-3 | 25 (8) vs 39 (12) | 24 (11) vs 36 (17) | 6 (4) vs 17 (12) | |
4-5 | 11 (4) vs 7 (2) | 16 (5) vs 17 (7) | 9 (6) vs 10 (7) | |
>6 | 253 (82) vs 276 (86) | 188 (82) vs 201 (79) | 123 (83) vs 123 (81) | |
PFS (months) | 12 vs 12 | 11 vs 12 | 15.1 vs 16.4 | Not specified |
OS (months) | 29 vs 30 | 23 vs 24 | 49 vs 44.3 | Not specified |
The number (%) or median is shown for PDS versus NACT-IDS.
Lymphadenectomy includes the pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes.
For operated patients, histology was diagnosed from surgical specimens in the JCOG 0602 trial.
Both study including latest data presented at ASCO 2018.
Abbreviations: PDS, primary debulking surgery; NACT-IDS, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery; No., number; AE, adverse event; PFS, progression-free survival; and OS, overall survival.