Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec 4;46(5):868–875. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.520

Table 1.

Demographic profile of patients in the four studies of PDS versus NACT-IDS.

Study EORTC55971 CHORUS JCOG0602 SCOPION
Year of publication 2010 2015 2016 2016
Countries Belgium, Canada, UK, Netherlands, Italy, Norway, and Spain UK and New Zealand Japan Italy
No. of patients 336 vs 334 276 vs 274 149 vs 152 84 vs 87
Age (years) 62 vs 63 66 vs 65 59 vs 60.5 54.8 vs 56.2
PS
0-1 294 (88) vs 290 (87) 221 (80) vs 221 (81) 130 (87) vs 131 (86) 51 (93) vs 50 (91)
2-3 40 (12) vs 44 (13) 54 (20) vs 53 (19) 19 (13) vs 21 (14) 4 (7) vs 5 (9)
Unknown 2 (0.6) vs 0 1 vs 0 0 0
CA125 (U/ml) 1130 vs 1180 Not specified Not specified 2653 vs. 2100
Initial tumor size (cm)
Up to 2 cm 4(1.2) vs 10(3) 13(5) vs 15(5) 32(22) vs 42(28) Not specified
>2-5 cm 90(27) vs 85(25) 59(21) vs 60(22) 42(28) vs 51(34)
>5-10 cm 90(27) vs88(26) 111(40) vs 110(40) 40(27) vs 35(23)
>10cm 131(39) vs 137(41) 86(32) vs 86(32) 35(24) vs 24(16)
Unknown 21(6.3) vs 14(4.2) 7(3) vs 5(2) 0 vs 0
FIGO Stage
II 0 vs. 0 12 (5) vs. 7 (3) 0 vs 0 0 vs 0
III 257 (77) vs. 253 (76) 190 (78) vs.165 (80) 100 (67) vs 105 (69) 71 (85) vs 79 (91)
IV 77 (23) vs. 81 (24) 41 (17) vs. 31 (15) 49 (33) vs 47 (31) 13 (16) vs 8 (9)
Others 2 (0.6) vs 0 12 vs 16 0 0
Histology **
Serous 220 (66) vs 194 (58) 219 (86) vs 185 (85) 116 (78) vs 110 (72) 82 (98) vs 87 (100)
Clear cell 6(2) vs 4 (1.2) 4 (2) vs 13 (6) 12(8) vs 4 (3) 1 (1.2) vs 0
Endometrioid 11 (3) vs 5 (1.5) 11 (4) vs 5 (2) 6 (4) vs 4 (3) 0 vs 0
Mucinous 8 (2) vs 11 (3) 2 (1) vs 4 (2) 2 (1.4) vs 2 (1.5) 0 vs 0
Others 91 (27) vs 120 (36) 19 (7) vs 12 (5) 12 (8) vs 18 (13) 1 (1.2) vs 0
Surgery
 Operating time (min) 165 vs 180 120 vs 120 341 vs 273 461 vs 253
 Blood loss (ml) Not specified Not specified 3447 vs 620 Not specified
 Lymphadenectomy* 26(8) vs 49(15) 3(1) vs 1(0.5) 29(20) vs 64(49) 21(38) vs 7(14)
 Abdominal organs resected 48(16) vs 28(9) 27(12) vs 18(8) 51(35) vs 33(25) 83(99) vs 33(38)
Complete surgery 61(19) vs 151(51) 39(17) vs 79(39) 45(31) vs 83(64) 40(48) vs 57(77)
Optimal surgery 131(42) vs 238(81) 96(41) vs147(73) 92(63) vs107(82) 78(93) vs 74(100)
Complications
 G3-4 postoperative AEs 68 (22) vs 21 (6.5) 74 (29) vs 31 (14) 24 (16) vs 7 (4.6) 39 (46) vs 7 (9.5)
  G3-4 thromboembolism 8 (3) vs 0 5 (2) vs 0 7 (5) vs 5 (3) Not specified
 G3-4 infection 25 (8.1) vs 5(2) 16 (6) vs 8 (3) 1 (0.7) vs 1 (0.8) Not specified
 Postoperative death 8 (2.5) vs 2(0.7) 14 (6) vs1 (0.5) 1 (0.7) vs 0 3 (3.6) vs 0
Chemotherapy
 Carboplatin plus taxane 243 (78) vs 283 (88) 138 (61) vs 178 (70) 148 (100) vs150 (100) 50 (98) vs 52 (100)
 Platinum only 25 (8) vs 20 (6) 89 (39) vs 75 (30) 0 vs 0 1(2) vs 0
 Others 21 (7) vs 19 (6) 1(0.1) vs 1(0.1) 0 vs 0 0 vs 0
Cycles Not specified
 0 21 (7) vs 0 1 (1) vs 0 11 (7) vs 2 (1)
 1-3 25 (8) vs 39 (12) 24 (11) vs 36 (17) 6 (4) vs 17 (12)
 4-5 11 (4) vs 7 (2) 16 (5) vs 17 (7) 9 (6) vs 10 (7)
 >6 253 (82) vs 276 (86) 188 (82) vs 201 (79) 123 (83) vs 123 (81)
PFS (months) 12 vs 12 11 vs 12 15.1 vs 16.4 Not specified
OS (months) 29 vs 30 23 vs 24 49 vs 44.3 Not specified

The number (%) or median is shown for PDS versus NACT-IDS.

*

Lymphadenectomy includes the pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes.

**

For operated patients, histology was diagnosed from surgical specimens in the JCOG 0602 trial.

Both study including latest data presented at ASCO 2018.

Abbreviations: PDS, primary debulking surgery; NACT-IDS, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery; No., number; AE, adverse event; PFS, progression-free survival; and OS, overall survival.