Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 11;82(7):3658–3675. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02058-3

Table 2.

Spearman’s correlations of the TPT with the convergent validity measures

Gold-MSI PSYCHOACOUSTICS1 PROMS
(timbre)
G0 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 Pitch Duration Profile
Match Envelope .43*** .38*** .46*** .40*** .33** .47*** .41*** .19 .00 .13

Memory

Envelope

.49*** .28** .45*** .31** .26* .44*** .38*** .19 .06 .18

Match

Flux

.39*** .42*** .51*** .33** .36*** .48*** .43*** .11 .16 .26*

Memory

Flux

.23* .36*** .39*** .14 .20 .34** .28* .08 .08 .13

Match

Centroid

.30** .42*** .36*** .34** .26** .37* .40*** .27* .07 .33**

Memory

Centroid

.20 .26* .27** .11 .12 .27** .22* .28* .07 .19

Match

Total

.50*** .54*** .61*** .50*** .42*** .60*** .54*** .28* .14 .36**

Memory

Total

.50*** .47*** .59*** .30** .30** .56*** .49*** .22* .12 .25*
Overall Score .52*** .56*** .64*** .45*** .40*** .62*** .56*** .27* .15 .33**

Note. G0 = Active Engagement; G1 = Perceptual Abilities; G2 = Musical Training; G3 = Singing Abilities; G4 = Emotions; G5 = General Sophistication

1Threshold of tests from PSYCHOACOUSTICS were calculated by taking the average of blocks converted into log values

*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001. Significant levels are adjusted according to Benjamini and Hochberg (1995)