Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;82(7):3357–3373. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02085-0

Table 1.

Statistics for the paired t test and Bayes factor comparisons

Single vs. dual 2nd target (traditional) Single vs. dual total Dual 2nd target (traditional) vs. E.V. under H0 (RT method) Dual 2nd target (traditional) vs. E.V. under H0 (obs. reversal rate)
T Targets

Exp. 1

df = 25

t = 4.44, p <.001

Bayes = .006

t = .85, p = .40 Bayes = 4.68 t = .18, p = .86; Bayes = 6.51 t = .44, p =.66; Bayes = 6.02

Exp. 2

df = 32

t = 3.20, p =.003

Bayes = .098

t = .88, p =.39

Bayes = 5.11

t = .72, p = .48; Bayes = 5.78 t = .12, p = .90, Bayes = 7.35
O Targets

Exp. 1

df = 25

t = 2.60, p = .015

Bayes = .361

t = .75, p = .46 Bayes 5.06 t = .50, p =.63; Bayes = 5.88 t = .07, p =.95; Bayes = 6.61

Exp. 2

df = 32

t = 2.84, p = .008

Bayes = .221

t = 0, p = 1

Bayes 7.41

t = .34, p =.74; Bayes = 7.00 t = 1.02, p = .32; Bayes = 4.50

Note. Bayes factors are expressed as the ratio of H0 to H1, such that a Bayes factor of 7 indicates that the null hypothesis is 7 times more likely than the alternative hypothesis. E.V. stands for the expected value as calculated using our formulae.