Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 5;10:16491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73339-y

Table 2.

Characteristics of FAF images used in deep learning training.

Subject IDa Fleck lesion type RE LE
Fleck count Fleck area (mm2) Fleck count Fleck area (mm2) Dice scoreb
1c Discrete 249 5.49 171 2.74
1c Discrete n/a 152 2.02
1c Discrete n/a 144 2.41
2 Diffuse 128 0.70 149 1.39
3a Discrete n/a 10 0.29
3b Discrete 167 4.85 207 4.85 0.77
4a Discrete 53 0.69 59 0.79 0.72
4b Discrete 159 4.36 233 3.71
5 Discrete 78 2.59 57 2.44
6 Discrete 202 2.11 249 2.76
7a Diffuse 202 2.04 182 1.34
7b Diffuse 109 1.38 147 1.29 0.61
8a Diffuse 5 0.05 7 0.07
8b Diffuse 71 1.48 50 1.03 0.63
9a Diffuse 37 1.03 109 1.57
9b Diffuse 47 0.35 102 0.68 0.60
10 Discrete 145 4.29 154 3.74 0.80
11 Discrete 101 2.02 124 2.17 0.70
12 Discrete 48 0.56 29 0.44 0.69
13 Discrete 34 0.73 35 0.79 0.57
14 Diffuse 57 0.43 67 0.48 0.33
15 Discrete 29 0.50 10 0.86
16 Discrete 50 2.85 89 2.55
17c Discrete n/a 64 0.71
17c Discrete n/a 52 0.60
18 Discrete n/a 55 2.43
19 Discrete n/a 155 5.55

n/a not applicable.

aIndividuals from the same family are indicated by a lower case letter following the same number; all were siblings except for subjects 3a and 3b, who were mother and son.

bDice score between manual and deep learning segmentation, only available in 10 left eye images used for validation.

cLongitudinal serial FAF images were used as part of the training set in subjects 1 and 17.