Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 21;107(4):714–726. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.08.022

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Simulation TWASs Comparing BGW-TWAS, BVSR with cis-eQTL only, PrediXcan, and TIGAR Methods

Simulation studies used various gene expression heritability he2=(0.05,0.1,0.2,0.5) and various true causal cis-eQTL proportions. Test R2 was calculated as the squared correlation between imputed GReX and simulated gene expression values of the test samples.

(A and B) Test R2 and TWAS power comparison with 5 true causal eQTL. BGW-TWAS was found to out-perform the alternative methods when a non-negligible proportion of true causal eQTL were from trans-genome regions.

(C and D) Test R2 and TWAS power comparison with 22 true causal eQTL. BGW-TWAS was found to out-perform alternative method when >50% of true causal eQTL were from trans-genome regions and he2>0.1.