Table 1.
Enrichment Estimates for 24 Non-Cell-Type-Specific Functional Categories for EOC and HGSOC
| Functional Category |
All EOC |
HGSOC |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrichment | p Value | Enrichment | p Value | |
| 3′ UTR | 17.29 | 0.02 | 18.40 | 0.01 |
| 5′ UTR | −0.62 | 0.89 | 5.12 | 0.71 |
| Coding | 3.55 | 0.75 | 8.05 | 0.30 |
| Conserved | 24.94 | 0.06 | 21.82 | 0.07 |
| CTCF | −9.62 | 0.11 | −3.86 | 0.47 |
| DGF | 1.71 | 0.82 | −0.92 | 0.52 |
| DHS | 3.42 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.83 |
| Enhancer | 2.66 | 0.69 | 2.56 | 0.71 |
| FANTOM5 enhancer | −2.46 | 0.86 | 12.42 | 0.51 |
| Fetal DHS | 0.41 | 0.87 | −1.52 | 0.50 |
| H3K27Ac (Hnisz et al.36) | 1.96 | 0.01 | 1.77 | 0.03 |
| H3K27Ac (PGC2) | 3.61 | 0.01 | 2.42 | 0.16 |
| H3Kme1 | 2.02 | 0.16 | 1.82 | 0.28 |
| H3Kme3 | 3.91 | 0.07 | 1.01 | 0.99 |
| H3K9ac | 3.25 | 0.33 | 0.90 | 0.96 |
| Intron | 1.46 | 0.12 | 1.24 | 0.35 |
| Promoter | 8.69 | 0.02 | 6.99 | 0.06 |
| Promoter flanking | 10.38 | 0.49 | −2.90 | 0.76 |
| Repressed | −0.32 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 0.64 |
| Superenhancer | 2.09 | 0.02 | 1.83 | 0.12 |
| Transcription factor binding site | 4.93 | 0.16 | 2.21 | 0.66 |
| Transcribed | 1.87 | 0.24 | 1.05 | 0.95 |
| TSS | 5.28 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.96 |
| Weak enhancer | 9.06 | 0.35 | 4.69 | 0.68 |
Enrichment was calculated as , which shows the proportion of estimated SNP heritability explained by the proportion of SNPs in the functional category. Statistically significant associations (p values < 0.05) are marked in bold.