Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;107(4):622–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.08.021

Table 1.

Enrichment Estimates for 24 Non-Cell-Type-Specific Functional Categories for EOC and HGSOC

Functional Category All EOC
HGSOC
Enrichment p Value Enrichment p Value
3′ UTR 17.29 0.02 18.40 0.01
5′ UTR −0.62 0.89 5.12 0.71
Coding 3.55 0.75 8.05 0.30
Conserved 24.94 0.06 21.82 0.07
CTCF −9.62 0.11 −3.86 0.47
DGF 1.71 0.82 −0.92 0.52
DHS 3.42 0.35 0.50 0.83
Enhancer 2.66 0.69 2.56 0.71
FANTOM5 enhancer −2.46 0.86 12.42 0.51
Fetal DHS 0.41 0.87 −1.52 0.50
H3K27Ac (Hnisz et al.36) 1.96 0.01 1.77 0.03
H3K27Ac (PGC2) 3.61 0.01 2.42 0.16
H3Kme1 2.02 0.16 1.82 0.28
H3Kme3 3.91 0.07 1.01 0.99
H3K9ac 3.25 0.33 0.90 0.96
Intron 1.46 0.12 1.24 0.35
Promoter 8.69 0.02 6.99 0.06
Promoter flanking 10.38 0.49 −2.90 0.76
Repressed −0.32 0.07 0.67 0.64
Superenhancer 2.09 0.02 1.83 0.12
Transcription factor binding site 4.93 0.16 2.21 0.66
Transcribed 1.87 0.24 1.05 0.95
TSS 5.28 0.55 0.56 0.96
Weak enhancer 9.06 0.35 4.69 0.68

Enrichment was calculated as Pr(hg2)/Pr(SNPs), which shows the proportion of estimated SNP heritability explained by the proportion of SNPs in the functional category. Statistically significant associations (p values < 0.05) are marked in bold.