Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 5;75:e1759. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1759

Table 1. Summary of included studies.

Study/year Patient Numbers Method TP FP FN TN SEN SPE PPV NPV
Vilmann P et al. (18) 28 EUS-FNA+EBUS-TBNA 28 0 0 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wallace MB et al. (19) 138 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-FNA 39 0 3 96 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.97
Szlubowski A et al. (20) 120 EUS-FNA+EBUS-TBNA 19 2 9 90 0.68 0.98 0.90 0.91
Annema JT et al. (21) 123 EUS-FNA+EBUS-TBNA 56 0 10 57 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Herth FJ et al. (28) 139 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-B-FNA 72 0 3 57 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95
Hwangbo B et al. (29) 143 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-B-FNA 41 0 4 98 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.96
Ohnishi R et al. (22) 110 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-FNA 28 0 11 71 0.72 1.00 1.00 0.87
Szlubowski A et al. (23) 110 EUS-FNA+EBUS-TBNA 55 1 5 49 0.92 0.98 0.98 0.91
Kang HJ (group A) et al. (24) 74 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-FNA 29 0 5 40 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.89
Kang HJ (group B) et al. (24) 74 EUS-FNA+EBUS-TBNA 23 0 2 49 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.96
Liberman M et al. (25) 166 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-FNA 41 0 5 120 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.96
Lee KJ et al. (30) 37 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-B-FNA 29 0 0 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Oki M et al. (31) 146 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-B-FNA 24 0 9 113 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.93
Szlubowski A et al. (32) 106 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-B-FNA 38 2 18 48 0.68 0.96 0.95 0.73
Crombag LMM et al. (33) 244 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-B-FNA 84 19 19 122 0.82 0.87 0.82 0.87
Tutar N et al. (26) 20 EBUS-TBNA+EUS-FNA 10 0 1 9 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90

FN, number of false negatives; FP, number of false positives; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; TN, number of true negatives; TP, number of true positives.