Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 26;2020:8757281. doi: 10.1155/2020/8757281

Table 3.

Overall performance in the learning curve.

r Interobserver agreement
Trainee/expert (1st reference) Trainee–laparoscopy (2nd reference)
Ultrasound MRI Ultrasound MRI
Frozen pelvis 0.903 (p 0.00) 0.735 (p 0.00) 0.623 (p 0.00) 0.128 (p 0.00)
Uterosacral ligaments 0.512 (p 0.00) 0.601 (p 0.00) 0.261 (p 0.01) 0.455 (p 0.00)
Bowel (rectum, rectosigmoid) 0.633 (p 0.00) 0.699 (p 0.00) 0.539 (p 0.00) 0.598 (p 0.00)
Endometriomas 0.706 (p 0.00) 0.828 (p 0.00) 0.754 (p 0.00) 0.746 (p 0.00)
Vagina Not computerised
Adenomyosis 0.769 (p 0.00) 0.279 (p 0.00) Not computerised
Bladder 1.0 (p 0.00) 0.717 (p 0.00) 0.800 (p 0.00) 0.717 (p 0.00)
Rectovaginal septum Not computerised
Pelvic DE overall 0.690 (p 0.00) 0.697 (p 0.00) 0.490 (p 0.00) 0.531 (p 0.00)

Agreement between trainees and experts and trainees and laparoscopy/histology in the overall assessment of endometriosis in all 3 blocks, expressed in Kappa value. DE: deep endometriosis; p: p value; POD: pouch of Douglas; R: rectum; RS: rectosigmoid; USL: uterosacral ligament. None of the 10 vaginal lesions were detected correctly by the trainees; only 4 rectovaginal septum lesions in the cohort out of which none was identified by the ultrasound trainee and only one correctly identified by the radiology trainee; adenomyosis detection was not assessed against laparoscopy/histology since only 1 patient had a hysterectomy.