Table 3.
r | Interobserver agreement | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Trainee/expert (1st reference) | Trainee–laparoscopy (2nd reference) | |||
Ultrasound | MRI | Ultrasound | MRI | |
Frozen pelvis | 0.903 (p 0.00) | 0.735 (p 0.00) | 0.623 (p 0.00) | 0.128 (p 0.00) |
Uterosacral ligaments | 0.512 (p 0.00) | 0.601 (p 0.00) | 0.261 (p 0.01) | 0.455 (p 0.00) |
Bowel (rectum, rectosigmoid) | 0.633 (p 0.00) | 0.699 (p 0.00) | 0.539 (p 0.00) | 0.598 (p 0.00) |
Endometriomas | 0.706 (p 0.00) | 0.828 (p 0.00) | 0.754 (p 0.00) | 0.746 (p 0.00) |
Vagina | Not computerised∗ | |||
Adenomyosis | 0.769 (p 0.00) | 0.279 (p 0.00) | Not computerised∗ | |
Bladder | 1.0 (p 0.00) | 0.717 (p 0.00) | 0.800 (p 0.00) | 0.717 (p 0.00) |
Rectovaginal septum | Not computerised∗ | |||
Pelvic DE overall | 0.690 (p 0.00) | 0.697 (p 0.00) | 0.490 (p 0.00) | 0.531 (p 0.00) |
Agreement between trainees and experts and trainees and laparoscopy/histology in the overall assessment of endometriosis in all 3 blocks, expressed in Kappa value. DE: deep endometriosis; p: p value; POD: pouch of Douglas; R: rectum; RS: rectosigmoid; USL: uterosacral ligament. ∗None of the 10 vaginal lesions were detected correctly by the trainees; only 4 rectovaginal septum lesions in the cohort out of which none was identified by the ultrasound trainee and only one correctly identified by the radiology trainee; adenomyosis detection was not assessed against laparoscopy/histology since only 1 patient had a hysterectomy.