Table 3.
Comparison of “Suicide CARE” versions 1.6 and 2.0
| Version 1.6 | Version 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | • Introduce suicide epidemiological data | • Quote the psychological autopsy interview reports (2015–2018) |
| • Emphasize the importance of the gatekeeper training program | ||
| • Quote written texts authored by Prof. Se-Won Lim | ||
| “Careful observation” | • Introduce theoretically relevant verbal, behavioral, and situational warning signs of suicide completers | • Introduce the real verbal, behavioral, and situational warning signs of suicide completers, based on the psychological autopsy interview reports (2015–2018) |
| • Explain the characteristics of the warning signs according to life cycles | ||
| “Active listening” | • Ask a question about suicidal ideation | • Connect the warning signs of “Care observation” with the question of “Active listening” |
| • Explain the concept of ambivalence | • Change the explaining pattern and design about the concept of ambivalence | |
| “Risk evaluation and Expert referral” | • Lists for safety check | • Dichotomize the lists for safety into the evaluation of suicide risk and helping safely |
| • Change video clips and role play |