Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 30;24(3):237–243. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_147_20

Table 4.

List of longitudinal studies that assessed the utility of TBS in detecting incident fragility fractures

References Study population, mean follow up (years) Fragility fractures (Incident) Results
Hans et al. 2011 Manitoba study[28] Women >50 years old, n=29,407, 4.7 years 1668- MOF (vertebral 439, hip 293) MOF: AUC 0.63 (0.61-0.64), HR 1.35 (1.20-1.42), Vertebral: AUC 0.66 (0.64-0.69), HR 1.22 (1.10-1.34), Hip: AUC 0.68 (0.65-0.71), HR 1.46 (1.13-1.46)
Boutroy et al. 2013 OFELY study[29] Postmenopausal women, n=560, 7.8±1.3 years 112 (vertebral 32, hip 8, wrist 35, others 37) OR 1.57 (1.25-1.98), AUC 0.63 (0.57-0.68), 35% fractures in osteopenic women- however was within lowest quartile of TBS
Briot et al. 2013 OPUS study[30] Women >55 years of age, n=1007, 6 years 82 clinical fractures, 46 radiological vertebral Clinical fracture: AUC 0.62 (0.56-0.69), OR 1.62 (1.3-2.01), Radiographic vertebral: AUC 0.63 (0.54-0.72), OR 1.54 (1.17-2.03)
Iki et al. 2015 JPOS study[31] Women >50 years of age, n=665, 10 years 92 vertebral fracture by VFA OR 1.98 (1.56-2.51), AUC 0.682 (0.662-0.773)
Popp et al. 2016[32] Women with mean age 76 years, n=556, 2.7 years 52 clinical fragility HR 2.01 (1.54-2.63), AUC 0.69 (0.62-0.77)
McCloskey et al. 2015[33] Men and women with a mean age of 72 years n=17809, 6.7 years 1109 (298 hip fracture) OR for MOF 1.44 (1.35-1.53)

MOF: Major osteoporotic fracture, AUC: Area under curve