Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;29(3):166–173. doi: 10.7570/jomes20028

Table 1.

Summary of studies on HPD

Variable Wycherley et al. (2012)4 Santesso et al. (2012)6 Skov et al. (1999)7 Weigle et al. (2005)8 Westerterp- Plantenga et al. (2004)9 Lejeune et al. (2005)10 Clifton et al. (2008)11 Layman et al. (2009)12
Remark Controlled, energy-restricted diet Controlled, nonenergy-restricted diet Ad libitum diet Weight regain after initial weight loss was assessed
Study design Meta-analysis Meta-analysis Randomized parallel Single-arm trial Randomized parallel Randomized parallel Randomized parallel Randomized parallel
Protein quantity (% of total energy)
HPD 27–35 16–45 25 30 18 18 34 30
Control diet 16–21 5–23 12 - 15 15 17 15
Number 1,063 1,577 65 19 148 113 79 130
Duration (mo) ≥1 ≥1 6 3 4 7 15 12
Body weight (kg) –0.79 (–1.50 to –0.08) –0.36 (–0.56 to –0.17) –3.7 (–6.2 to –1.3) –4.9± 0.5 NS –2.9 NS NS
BMI (kg/m2) - –0.37 (–0.56 to 0.19) - - –0.9 –1.0 - -
Waist circumference (cm) - –0.43 (–0.69 to –0.16) - - –3.0 –1.7 - -
Fat mass (kg) –0.87 (–1.26 to –0.48) - –3.3 (–5.5 to –1.1) –3.7± 0.4 –3.4 –2.6 NS –1.7
FFM (kg) 0.43 (0.09 to 0.78) - - - NS NS - NS
REE (kJ/day) 595.5 (67.0 to 1,124.1) - - NS NS - - -
SBP (mmHg) –0.21 (–0.32 to –0.09) –0.21 (–0.32 to –0.09) - - - - - -
DBP (mmHg) –0.18 (–0.29 to –0.06) –0.18 (–0.29 to –0.06) - - - - - -
TC (mg/dL) NS NS - - - - - -
Triglycerides (mg/dL) –20.3 (–29.2 to –10.6) –45.1 (–69.0 to –21.2) - - –16.6 - NS -
HDL-C (mg/dL) NS 9.6 (2.7 to 16.9) - - - - NS -
LDL-C (mg/dL) NS NS - - - - NS -
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) NS NS - NS NS NS NS -
Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) NS –0.03 (–0.05 to –0.01) - NS NS NS - -
HbA1c (%) - NS - - - - - -
FFA (μmol/L) - - - NS NS NS NS -
C-reactive protein (mmol/L) - NS - - - - - -
Comment 52% Less weight regain, only consisting of FFM 64% Less weight regain, only consisting of FFM Protein intake was directly related to weight loss and change. Lipids, glucose, insulin, and C-reactive protein all improved with weight loss. For completers, the mean weight loss was 23% greater for HPD group. HPD group showed sustained favorable effects on serum triglycerides and HDL-C.

Values are presented as mean (95% confidence interval) or mean± standard deviation.

HPD, high-protein diet; NS, not significant; BMI, body mass index; FFM, fat-free mass; REE, resting energy expenditure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; FFA, free fatty acids.