Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 6;20:1505. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09573-w

Table 4.

Effects of psychosocial work stress and precarious working conditions on PPD, controlled for age, professional education, anxiety, and parity; R2 = .153

B SE B β 95% CI p
Constant 1.817 1.281 [−0.699; 4.334] .157
Education −0.246 0.294 −0.036 [− 0.823; 0.331] .402
Anxietya 0.378 0.057 0.281 [0.266; 0.490] .000
Age 0.042 0.040 0.047 [−0.037; 0.121] .299
Parity −0.819 0.367 −0.026 [−1.540; − 0.098] .061
EPRESb 0.983 0.343 0.131 [.309; 1.657] .004
WPCc 0.017 0.008 0.094 [.001; 0.032] .041
ERI Ratiod 0.227 0.430 0.025 [−0.618; 1.072] .598

Note. B Unstandardized regression coefficient, SE B Standard error for unstandardized beta, β Standardized beta coefficient, R2 Coefficient of determination. a Subscale of Symptom-Checklist Revised (SCL-90-R). b Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES). c work-privacy conflict (WPC). d Effort-reward imbalance (ERI). Significant associations (p < .05) are presented in bold