Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct;61(10):1468–1475. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.237230

TABLE 1.

Fold Change in Average Tumor Volume from Baseline of Combination Therapies vs. Corresponding Monotherapies and Bliss Synergy Interaction Values

177Lu-lilotomab (MBq/kg) Fold change from day 0
Study day Without rituximab With rituximab Interaction value
3 0 2.2 2.2
150 1.7 1.6 0.99 (0.41, 2.37)
350 2.3 1.7 0.77 (0.32, 1.84)
7 0 6.1 5.5
150 3.3 2.4 0.80 (0.33, 1.91)
350 2.7 1.6 0.66 (0.28, 1.57)
9 0 9.2 8.9
150 4.4 3.0 0.70 (0.29, 1.68)
350 3.1 1.6 0.53 (0.22, 1.23)
10 0 11.8 10.6
150 4.3 3.1 0.79 (0.33, 1.89)
350 3.2 1.7 0.61 (0.26, 1.46)
13 0 20.4 16.6
150 5.0 3.2 0.79 (0.33, 1.89)
350 3.1 1.3 0.51 (0.22, 1.23)
15 0 36.2 28.8
150 5.7 3.3 0.74 (0.31, 1.77)
350 3.3 1.3 0.50 (0.21, 1.21)
17 0 57.8 42.6
150 7.7 3.5* 0.61 (0.25, 1.47)
350 3.5 1.0 0.39 (0.16, 0.94)
20 0 116.6 80.2
150 10.2 4.2* 0.60 (0.25, 1.43)
350 4.1 1.0 0.36 (0.15, 0.86)
*

Significant rituximab effect with 150 MBq/kg 177Lu-lilotomab (P < 0.05).

Significant rituximab effect with 350 MBq/kg 177Lu-lilotomab (P < 0.05).

Significant synergism (P < 0.05).

Data in parentheses are 90% confidence intervals.