Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):2955–2976.

Table 3.

Combined effect of past OC use and risk genotypes (ONECUT2 rs4092465 GA; HNF4A rs1800961 TT) on CRC risk overall and in BMI strata

n£ Risk genotype + past OC use

Total n HR (95% CI) p *
<Overall group>
0 3,559 reference
1 4,949 4.40 (3.32-5.83) < 2e-16
2 1,634 17.54 (13.22-23.28) < 2e-16
p trend < 2e-16
<Non-overall obese group, BMI < 30 kg/m2 (n=7,151)>
0 2,594 reference
1 3,501 4.23 (3.08-5.82) < 2e-16
2 1,056 17.41 (12.62-24.02) < 2e-16
p trend < 2e-16
<Overall obese group, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (n=2,991)>
0 965 reference
1 1,448 5.08 (2.77-9.30) 1.37e-07
2 578 19.96 (10.91-36.51) < 2e-16
p trend < 2e-16

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CRC, colorectal cancer; HR, hazard ratio; OC, oral contraceptive. Numbers in bold face are statistically significant.

£

The combined number of risk genotypes and behavioral factors was based on 1) risk genotypes defined as 0 (low risk: none or 1 risk allele) and 1 (high risk: 2 risk alleles) and 2) behavioral factors defined as 0 (low risk: past OC use ≥ 5.1 years) and 1 (high risk: past OC use < 5.1 years).

The ultimate number of combined risk genotypes and behavioral factors was defined as 0 (low risk for genotypes and behaviors), 1 (high risk for either genotypes or behaviors), and 2 (high risk for both genotypes and behaviors).

Multivariate regression was adjusted by age at enrollment, education, BMI (in overall group), height and weight (in BMI strata), waist-to-hip ratio, age at menopause, total months of breastfeeding, and exogenous estrogen plus progestin.

*

p values were adjusted to correct for multiple testing via the Benjamini-Hochberg approach.