Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;12(9):5170–5187.

Table 1.

Cyclin E expression in different types of cancer

Type of carcinoma Total number of cases Number of cases of cyclin E overexpression Rate of cyclin E overexpression Significance and conclusion of the study Reference
Gastric cancer 84 34 40.5% Cyclin E overexpression was related to poor survival rates; it may useful as a prognostic measure in gastric cancer. [23]
Knockout of INMAP 89 35 39.3% Cyclin E overexpression was an important prognostic factor with regard to survival. Patients with low cyclin E expression had higher five-year survival rates than patients with high expression. [24]
Hepatocellular cancer and intraoperative cancer 90 45 50% Cyclin E overexpression was associated with the formation of tumor thrombi, tumor invasion and metastatic potential. [25]
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 118 39 33.1% Cyclin E overexpression was identified as an independent predictor of poor outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients. [26]
Metastatic colon cancer 114 32 28% Cyclin E overexpression in cancer was related to an increased risk of tumor recurrence and poor outcomes. [27]
Rectal cancer 360 104 29% Evaluation of cyclin E expression may provide useful prognostic information for rectal cancer patients. [28]
Non-small cell lung cancer 156 64 41% Cyclin E expression was highly variable and determined to play a role in tumor grade and differentiation in NSCLC. [31]