Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;59(37):16002–16006. doi: 10.1002/anie.202006268

Table 1.

Calculated 19F NMR chemical shifts relative to CFCl3 (in ppm) of [XFn] (X=Cl, Br, I; n=2, 4, 6) in comparison with experimental values.

Molecule

δ exp

δ BHLYP [a]

δ LH12ct‐sifPW92 [a]

[ClF2]

−125[b]

−202

−174

[ClF4]

677

68

61

[ClF6]

278

249

[BrF2]

−2103a

−296

−273

[BrF4]

−378

−42

−45

[BrF6]

948

129

112

[IF2]

−286, −2823a, 17

−360

−348

[IF4]

−1063a, 18

−111

−117

[IF6]

1319

30

14

[a] DFT(COSMO,CH3CN)‐GIAO/pcSseg‐4/ANO‐RCC‐unc//BP86‐D3(BJ)(COSMO,CH3CN))/def2‐TZVPPD data. [b] This work.