Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;85(9):2902–2914. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15354

Table 5.

Percentage of JAR category choice by consumers across all dishes and recipes for adequacy of flavor, saltiness, and aftertaste (n = 163 consumers)

Flavor Saltiness Aftertaste
Dish Recipe TL JAR TM Sig a TL JAR TM Sig a TL JAR TM Sig a
RV S 10.43 54.60 34.97 a 9.82 66.87 23.31 a 9.20 59.51 31.29 a
R 20.86 50.92 28.22 a 22.09 68.10 9.82 b 15.95 60.12 23.93 a
M 14.72 55.83 29.45 a 14.11 76.69 9.20 a 9.20 57.67 33.13 a
QB S 14.11 60.12 25.77 a 15.34 63.80 20.86 a 9.82 57.67 32.52 a
R 53.37 38.04 8.59 b 62.58 34.36 3.07 b 27.61 56.44 15.95 b
M 23.93 61.35 14.72 c 27.61 66.87 5.52 c 14.11 60.12 25.77 a
SD S 11.04 44.17 44.79 a 13.50 56.44 30.06 a 13.50 55.83 30.67 a
R 31.29 39.88 28.83 b 28.83 61.35 9.82 b 19.63 61.35 19.02 a
M 23.31 50.92 25.77 b 20.25 69.33 10.43 b 16.56 55.83 27.61 a
CR S 17.18 39.26 43.56 a 47.24 42.33 10.43 a 11.04 50.92 38.04 a
R 33.13 21.47 45.40 b 63.80 27.61 8.59 b 18.40 47.24 34.36 a
M 36.20 30.67 33.13 b 57.06 36.20 6.75 b 15.34 56.44 28.22 a

S, Standard; R, reduced salt; M, MSG recipe; TL, too little; JAR, just about right; TM, too much.

a

Different letters (a, b, c) in Sig column indicate significant differences among the JAR scores distribution, determined using CMH method and Stuart–Maxwell as post‐hoc at family wise significance level of 0.05.