Table 2.

Key components and effects of the interventions

	Key component								Positive effect is found in (one of them) included studies on the outcome
Intervention	Assessment of patient's functionality	Goal‐setting together with the patient	Establishment of an individualized plan for the patient	Engagement of patients in physical/ADLs	Assessment/adapta tion of environment	Training of all staff	Ongoing motivation and support of staff	Multidisciplinary approach
									Mo	PA	FS
Abilities‐focused care (Sidani et al., 2012)	✓		✓	✓					n/a	n/a	–
ADL goal‐setting tool (Parsons et al., 2013)	✓	✓	✓	✓				✓	+	n/a	n/a
ADL training (Henskens et al. 2017; Henskens, Nauta, Drost, et al, 2018; Henskens, Nauta, van Eekeren, et al., 2018)	✓	✓	✓	✓			✓	✓	+	n/a	–
Client‐centered ADL (Bertilsson et al., 2014; Guidetti and Ytterberg, 2011; Hedman et al., 2019)	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓				n/a	n/a	–
Functional activity program (Kerse et al., 2008; Peri et al., 2008)	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓		–	n/a	+
Function‐focused care (Galik et al., 2008, 2013, 2015; Resnick et al., 2006; Resnick, Galik, et al., 2009; Resnick, Gruber‐Baldini, et al., 2009; Resnick et al., 2011)	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		+	+	+
Neurodevelopmental treatment (Hafsteinsdóttir et al., 2005)				✓				✓	n/a	n/a	–
Reablement (Tuntland et al., 2015)	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓	–	n/a	+
Restorative care (Tinetti et al., 2002)	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	+	n/a	–

Note: “+”, positive significant effect was found; “–”, no significant effect was found.

Abbreviations: ADL, activity of daily living; FS, functional status outcome; Mo, mobility outcome; n/a, not applicable; PA, physical activity outcome.