Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;15(17):1661–1671. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202000260

Table 1.

Cytotoxicity and anti‐influenza virus activity in MDCK[a] cell cultures.

Compound

Cytotoxicity [μM]

Antiviral EC50 [d] [μM]

A/H1N1

A/H3N2

Influenza B

MCC[b]

CC50 [c]

CPE

MTS

CPE

MTS

CPE

MTS

12

42

4

>100

>100

>100*

>100*

>100

>100

13

0.8

0.8

>100

>100

>100*

>100*

>100

>100

15

100

>100

7.7

7.2

2.3

1.9

8.9

11

16

100

97

5.6

1.6

2.3*

2.5*

5.6

6.5

17

100

44

6.8

8.6

1.2

1.6

4.0

3.4

18

4.2

>100

>100*

>100

teicoplanin

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

14

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

vancomycin⋅HCl

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

>100

zanamivir

>100

>100

1.5

3.1

20

9.0

2

1.7

[a] Madin Darby canine kidney cells. Virus strains: A/H1 N1: A/Ned/378/05; A/H3 N2: A/HK/7/87* or A/Victoria/361/11; influenza B virus: B/Ned/537/05. [b] Minimum cytotoxic concentration, i. e., minimal compound concentration causing a microscopically detectable alteration in cell morphology. [c] 50 % cytotoxic concentration based on the formazan‐based MTS cell viability assay. [d] 50 % effective concentration, or concentration producing 50 % inhibition of virus‐induced cytopathic effect, as determined by visual CPE scoring (left column), or by measuring cell viability with the MTS assay (right column).