Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;182(10):2297–2316. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61787

TABLE 1.

Quality of evidence scoring tool

Score
Scoring domain Strong Moderate Weak
Data source Was the data source complete and representative of the population as a whole?
  • Community/population‐based screening/newborn screening

  • Disease registry

  • Hospital‐based records

  • Laboratory‐based records

  • General practice‐based records

  • Survey by query (e.g., postcards)

  • Personal communication

  • NR, unclear, other

Diagnostic method Was the method(s) used for the case definition definitive? a
  • Radiographic

  • Autopsy

  • Positive mutational analysis

  • Clinical presentation only

  • NR

  • Too vague to determine

Numerator Was reporting of the numerator sufficient (describes any combination of live births, still born, spontaneous abortions/pregnancy terminations)?
  • The numerator is well described

  • Not applicable

  • Numerator is not sufficiently described

Denominator Was reporting of the denominator sufficient and appropriate?
  • The denominator is congruent with the numerator in terms of setting and pregnancy outcome

  • Not applicable

  • The denominator is not congruent with the numerator

  • Denominator is not sufficiently described

Population size Was the population size adequate to estimate birth prevalence with 95% confidence? (Naing et al., 2006)
  • Adequate (≥170,000)

  • Not adequate for this certainty level (≥100,000–170,000)

  • <100,000, NR

Abbreviation: NR, not reported.

a

When methods varied among sites or across time, the study was assigned the value of the lowest scoring method.