Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;182(10):2297–2316. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61787

TABLE 4.

Meta‐analysis of reported achondroplasia birth prevalence stratified by study setting and by region

Pooled birth prevalence per 100,000 Higgins I 2 test (95% CI)
Quality effects model (95% CI) Random effects model (95% CI) p value b N studies; N estimates Quality index a
Worldwide 4.6 (3.9–5.4) 4.5 (4.1–5.0)

84.3 (81.3–86.9)

<.001

52; 90 23.0
Specialized care c 13.3 (5.3–24.6) 16.4 (8.8–26.3)

78.4 (64.3–87.0)

<.001

14; 14 30.2
Other settings d 4.2 (3.5–4.9) 4.2 (3.7–4.6)

84.2 (80.8–87.0)

<.001

38; 76 18.8
North America 4.2 (3.5–5.0) 4.2 (3.5–4.9)

71.18 (51.3–82.9)

<.001

9; 15 52.5
South America 3.5 (2.1–5.3) 3.9 (2.5–5.7)

91.4 (84.1–95.4)

<.001

5; 6 11.0
Europe 3.5 (3.0–4.2) 3.6 (3.2–4.0)

76.2 (67.9–82.4)

<.001

13; 40 14.5
North Africa and Middle east 35.1 (14.9–63.0) 43.1 (23.0–69.3)

82.6 (71.5–89.4)

<.001

13; 13 18.6
Sub‐Saharan Africa 17.9 (3.0–42.8) 12.8 (2.2–30.6)

82.7 (60.5–92.5)

<.001

5; 5 65.4
South and Southeast Asia/Oceania 5.9 (2.9–10.0) 6.3 (3.8–9.4)

61.9 (26.7–80.3)

<.001

11;11 33.1

Abbreviation: CI, confidence intervals.

a

The quality index represents the extent to which (percent) the weights of the inverse variance fixed effect model are redistributed by the application of the quality effect weights.

b

Chi2 p‐value.

c

Women who gave birth in a specialized care setting (i.e., referral center or tertiary hospital).

d

Women who gave birth in other settings (not a referral center or tertiary hospital).