Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;13(17):4595–4604. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202000849

Table 2.

Lignosulfonate composition based on EA, HS‐GC, 31P NMR spectroscopy, and acidic methanolysis.

Sample

Elemental analysis

HS‐GC

31P NMR

Methanolysis

method

name

C9 formulae

C9 M w [g mol−1]

SO3H [mmol g−1]

OCH3 [mmol g−1]

aliphatic OH [mmol g−1]

phenolic OH [mmol g−1]

sugars [mg g−1]

HIC

LS

C9H11.2N0.06S0.32O4.3

198.6

1.63

4.14

2.43

1.88

11.32

1F

C9H11.7N0.19S0.39O4.8

211.8

1.84

3.36

1.44

1.78

7.41

2F

C9H12.4N0.19S0.38O4.9

213.5

1.77

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

3F

C9H11.0N0.20S0.34O5.0

212.5

1.58

3.20

0.70

1.31

8.90

4F

C9H10.8N0.16S0.31O4.2

199.0

1.58

4.03

1.05

1.41

9.60

5 F

C9H10.7N0.11S0.33O5.2

213.3

1.53

3.14

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

6F

C9H10.9N0.13S0.29O5.2

213.3

1.38

2.79

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

UF

3–10

C9H11.0N0.05S0.36O4.2

199.0

1.83

4.30

2.93

1.94

8.34

10

C9H10.9N0.07S0.41O4.5

204.7

2.01

3.83

2.43

2.31

11.03

10–30

C9H10.7N0.04S0.35O4.2

197.3

1.79

4.13

2.84

1.81

14.45

30–100

C9H10.5N0.17S0.33O3.7

191.6

1.74

3.87

2.75

1.78

n.d.

100

C9H10.8N0.04S0.32O4.0

193.7

1.66

4.13

2.49

1.72

12.43