Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 May 23;109:103654. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103654

Table 4.

Linear Mixed Model for Intake per Minute (Natural Log Transformed).

Variable b 95% CI t P > |t| F P > F
Intercept 0.766 [0.494, 1.038] 5.58 < .001
Staff positive utterances/minute −0.006 [−0.054, 0.041] −0.26 .793 0.57 .452
Resident positive utterances/minute 2.13 .125
 Between 0 and 3 vs. 0 0.193 [0.000, 0.386] 1.99 .049
 3 or more vs. 0 −0.012 [−0.522, 0.498] −0.05 .963
Resident negative utterances (no vs. 1 or more) −0.029 [−0.159, 0.101] −0.45 .655 0.20 .655
Food type (liquid vs. solid food) −0.450 [−0.682, −0.219] −3.86 < .001 14.91 < .001
Video duration [ln(minutes)] 0.111 [−0.022, 0.244] 1.65 .102 0.10 .758
Staff positive utterances/minute * food type (liquid vs. solid food) 0.046 [0.005, 0.087] 2.25 .027 5.05 .027
Staff positive utterances/minute * resident positive utterances/minute 3.64 .030
 Between 0 and 3 vs. 0 −0.060 [−0.107, 0.014] −2.56 .012
 3 or more vs. 0 −0.019 [−0.085, 0.047] −0.58 .564
Resident negative utterances (no vs. 1 or more) * video duration [ln(minutes)] −0.247 [−0.403, −0.091] −3.15 .002 9.89 .002
Years staff worked as a caregiver −0.001 [−0.011, 0.009] −0.17 .869 0.03 .869
Resident age (years) −0.007 [−0.016, 0.001] −1.85 .072 3.42 .072
Resident gender (male vs. female) 0.162 [0.032, 0.291] 2.59 .017 6.73 .017
Resident eating function (proportion of intake episodes initiated by resident) 1.59 .227
 0 – 25% vs. 75% – 100% −0.050 [−0.212, 0.112] −0.64 .530
 Between 25% and 75% vs. 75% – 100% 0.079 [−0.076, 0.233] 1.04 .308

Note: b = unstandardized regression coefficient estimate; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; p > |t| = p-values for a t-test of significance of an effect or a level of an effect; p > F = p-values for an F-test of significance of each effect overall. N = 104 videos.