Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0238934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238934

Table 6. Rice grain yield and yield components under combined organic and inorganic N fertilization.

Treatment DM PN PL SSP FGP TGW GY
(days) (hill-1) (cm) (panicle-1) (%) (g) (g hill-1)
Early season 107c 22.9d 79.7c 19.4d 21.1c
T1 7.2c 142.2d
T2 108b 9.6b 23.1c 148.1c 85.5a 25.5a 38.6b
T3 113ab 9.8b 23.9b 152.3b 84.3b 24.7bc 38.1b
T4 114a 11.8a 26.8a 155.5a 85.9a 24.8ab 42.4a
T5 113ab 9.9b 23.8b 152.7b 84.1b 23.8b 38.9b
T6 114a 11.7a 27.0a 156.1a 85.5a 25.2a 42.8a
Average 111.5b 10.3a 25.4a 151.4a 84.1a 23.9 36.9a
Late season 110c 22.8d 77.5c 19.2d 20.1c
T1 7.1c 142.2d
T2 110c 8.9b 22.4c 147.9c 81.3a 24.4a 35.8b
T3 115ab 9.4b 23.6b 153.0b 84.9a 22.8b 36.6b
T4 116a 10.2a 25.9a 154.5a 85.1a 24.1a 41.1a
T5 114b 9.3b 23.5b 152.6b 84.0a 22.8b 36.2b
T6 116a 10.3a 26.6a 156.2a 85.2a 24.7a 41.2a
Average 113.5a 9.2b 24.6a 151.1a 80.1b 23.0b 35.1b
ANOVA
Treatments ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Seasons * * ns Ns * * *
S × T ns ns ns Ns ns ns ns

Note: The treatment coding details already showed in the above table. DM—day to maturity, PN—panicle number, PL—panicle length, SSP, spikelet per panicle, FGP—filled grain percent, TGW—thousand-grain weight, GY—grain yield. The mean comparison in columns was made using Tukey tests for treatments mean in both seasons and the lettering was done on basis of Tukey HSD test at 5% using simple effect. ns = non-significant

*, ** = significant at 5% and ** at 1%, respectively.