Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239580

Table 4. Bivariate and multivariable analysis of intervention effect on uptake of cervical cancer screening.

Variable Crude OR (95%CI) Adjusted OR (95%CI)
Group Control 1 1
Intervention 2.58(1.66–4.02) 2.43(1.58–3.9)
Age 30–34 years 1 1
35–39 years 0.98(0.70–1.38) 0.97(0.68–1.37)
40–44 years 1.40(0.96–2.89) 1.5(0.85–2.64)
45–49 years 1.89(0.89–4.02) 1.56(0.73–3.33)
Marital status Married  1 1
Never married 1.63(0.95–2.79) 1.45(0.84–2.52)
Divorced/ Separated 1.57(0.87–2.84) 1.39(0.77–2.51)
Widowed 2.15(0.74–6.21 2.09(0.71–6.17)
Educational status Illiterate 1
Primary school 0.76(0.48–1.19) 0.75(0.47–1.20)
Secondary school 0.97(0.62–1.51) 0.97(0.61–1.52)
Technical and vocational training 0.99(0.56–1.74) 0.94(0.52–1.68)
First degree and above 2.0(1.15–3.49) 2.03(1.15–3.58)
Woman occupation House wife 1 1
Government 2.14(1.48–3.11) 1.60(1.03–2.49)
Private 1.14(0.80–1.63 1.04(0.71–1.52)
1.37(0.63–3.0) 1.11(0.49–2.49)
Religion Orthodox 1 -
Catholic 0.83(0.12–5.55)
Protestant 1.47(0.94–2.28)
Muslim 1.07(0.74–1.55)
History of STI No 1 1
Yes 1.57(1.04–2.36) 1.55(1.01–2.36)
Unknown 1.59(0.27–9.37) 1.27(0.25–6.53)
Tested for HIV No 1
Yes 0.53(0.29–0.97) 0.57(0.31–1.04)
HIV test result Negative 1 -
Positive 1.11(0.59–2.08)