Table 2.
group | variable | n | sex × age interaction | effect of sex |
effect of s(age) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
est. | s.e. | t-value | p-value | sex | edf | F | p-value | ||||
Hadza | ENMO | 53 (29M, 24F) | no; p = 0.49 | −6.74 | 4.32 | −1.56 | 0.13 | both | 1 | 5.11 | 0.03* |
MVPA | 49 (27M, 22F) | no; p = 0.71 | −13.99 | 26.14 | −0.54 | 0.60 | both | 1 | 6.87 | 0.01* | |
walk test | 32 (18M, 14F) | no; p = 0.34 | 14.54 | 8.88 | 1.64 | 0.11 | both | 1.15 | 1.27 | 0.33 | |
gripstrength | 124 (75M, 49F) | yes; p = 0.02* | 4.90 | 1.11 | 4.40 | 2.51e−5* | male | 5.37 | 19.53 | <2e−16* | |
female | 4.65 | 9.29 | 5.68e−8* | ||||||||
Pokot | ENMO | 39 (22M, 17F) | no; p = 0.96 | 8.97 | 3.42 | 2.63 | 0.01* | both | 1 | 10.72 | 2.29e−3* |
MVPAa | 31 (20M, 11F) | no; p = 0.72 | 27.95 | 16.91 | 1.65 | 0.11 | both | 1.02 | 28.52 | 6.69e−6* | |
walk test | 45 (22M, 23F) | no; p = 0.86 | 15.06 | 7.54 | 2.00 | 0.05 | both | 1.98 | 3.91 | 0.03* | |
grip strength | 45 (22M, 23F) | yes; p = 6.36e−4* | 13.11 | 2.05 | 6.40 | 1.46e−07* | male | 3.21 | 5.96 | 6.93e−4* | |
female | 1 | 0.30 | 0.59 |
aThe authors have previously published [29] on physical activity levels in this Pokot sample and used GLMs to assess the effect of age on MVPA.