Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 21;375(1811):20190607. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0607

Table 1.

Results of GAMM models for estimated lean body mass (ELBM) and activity budgets. The model was estimated controlling for sex (upper section), then respecified to determine whether smooth functions differed by sex (lower section). edf, estimated degrees of freedom.

variable ELBM in trees travel feed ripe fruit rest
global fit adjusted R2 0.318 0.569 0.347 0.589 0.374 0.543
SexM estimate
t
p
0.141
12.6
<0.0001
−0.424
−12.1
<0.0001
0.140
2.7
0.007
−0.061
−2.6
0.008
−0.086
−3.1
0.002
0.007
0.2
0.823
age (smooth) edf
F
p
2.785
5.5
0.0006
1.004
11.1
0.0008
2.322
1.1
0.480
1.003
6.4
0.011
1.239
12.2
<0.0001
1.228
0.3
0.744
diet (smooth) edf
F
p
3.280
6.3
0.0002
1.425
1.7
0.12
1.005
13.0
0.0003
1.746
9.6
<0.0001
2.099
56.6
<0.0001
2.821
4.3
0.008
chimpanzee (random) edf
F
p
34.424
33.1
<0.0001
23.062
6.4
<0.0001
22.574
5.3
<0.0001
19.589
2.6
<0.0001
12.738
1.9
<0.0001
20.946
3.7
<0.0001
study month (random) edf
F
p
219.499
33.1
<0.0001
57.831
2.2
<0.0001
68.411
2.5
<0.0001
75.787
4.7
<0.0001
34.944
1.5
<0.0001
71.838
3.8
<0.0001
fits by sex
females (smooth) edf
F
p
1.000
4.8
0.028
1.001
4.1
0.044
2.666
1.9
0.134
1.005
2.7
0.100
1.011
5.4
0.019
1.075
0.1
0.885
males (smooth) edf
F
p
2.981
6.2
0.0002
1.535
5.0
0.021
1.002
0.1
0.732
1.015
3.5
0.062
1.027
11.2
0.0008
1.005
0.2
0.670
age × SexM (smooth) edf
F
p
4.172
4.3
0.0005
1.538
0.2
0.733
1.002
1.0
0.324
1.011
0.01
0.938
1.008
0.1
0.700
1.003
0.01
0.912