Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;9(19):7100–7106. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3392

Table 2.

Clinical outcome of patient subsets segregated by MAD

Variables OS DFS DMFS RRFS
MAD value P value P value P value P value
HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
>4 vs ≤4 cm P < .001 P = .001 P = .001 P = .340
HR = 2.83 (1.55‐5.14) HR = 2.35 (1.38‐3.99) HR = 2.82 (1.51‐5.27) HR = 1.76 (0.54‐5.68)
>3 vs ≤3 cm P = .009 P = .064 P = .139 P = .043
HR = 1.70 (1.13‐2.54) HR = 1.38 (0.98‐1.95) HR = 1.39 (0.90‐2.16) HR = 1.91 (1.01‐3.62)
>2 vs ≤2 cm P = .169 P = .136 P = .054 P = .081
HR = 1.33 (0.89‐1.99) HR = 1.28 (0.92‐1.78) HR = 1.54 (0.99‐2.39) HR = 1.86 (0.92‐3.78)

Clinical outcome was described by Kaplan‐Meier plots of OS, DFS, DMFS, and RRFS P < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DFS, disease‐free survival; DMFS, distant metastasis–free survival; HR, hazard ratio; MAD, maximal axial diameter; OS, overall survival; RRFS, regional relapse–free survival.