Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;11:582209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582209

TABLE 3.

Percentage (±SD) of the distribution of the verbal behaviors of coaches according to their academic background.

Verbal behavior Average Non-university (%) University (%) p F ηp2
Instruction 39.80 (8.88) 43.18 (9.07) 36.41 (7.37) 0.012** 6.60 0.08
Positive specific feedback 10.95 (5.40) 12.17 (6.19) 9.72 (4.22) 0.056 3.77 0.05
Hustle 7.20 (3.58) 6.50 (3.61) 7.89 (3.46) 0.957 0.00 0.00
Game information/result 5.67 (8.77) 7.04 (11.07) 4.30 (5.45) 0.150 2.12 0.03
Management direct 5.51 (3.69) 4.75 (3.52) 6.26 (3.74) 0.184 1.80 0.02
Other uncategorized behaviors 4.62 (2.71) 4.45 (2.99) 4.78 (2.41) 0.201 1.66 0.02
Encourage 4.48 (2.94) 4.70 (3.06) 4.26 (2.83) 0.576 0.31 0.00
Negative general feedback 3.63 (2.43) 2.73 (2.02) 4.53 (2.49) 0.008* 7.48 0.09
Positive general feedback 2.90 (2.61) 1.99 (2.04) 3.80 (2.82) 0.026* 5.18 0.07
Response to question 2.77 (1.81) 2.38 (1.46) 3.15 (2.05) 0.188 1.77 0.02
Explanation/information 2.61 (1.24) 2.30 (1.26) 2.91 (1.15) 0.080 3.16 0.04
Corrective feedback 2.44 (1.74) 1.84 (1.35) 3.04 (1.89) 0.018* 5.86 0.07
Negative specific feedback 1.96 (2.09) 1.58 (1.58) 2.33 (2.46) 0.305 0.30 0.01
Alert/report 1.62 (2.12) 1.31 (1.94) 1.92 (2.26) 0.707 0.14 0.00
Convergent question 1.31 (1.18) 0.84 (0.90) 1.77 (1.26) 0.002* 9.96 0.12
Divergent question 0.75 (0.88) 0.58 (0.83) 0.92 (0.91) 0.159 2.02 0.02
Humor 0.72 (1.44) 0.26 (0.45) 1.18 (1.90) 0.003* 9.33 0.12
Positive modeling 0.39 (0.45) 0.33 (0.34) 0.45 (0.54) 0.360 0.84 0.01
Verbal protocol analysis 0.38 (0.40) 0.42 (0.41) 0.33 (0.39) 0.319 1.00 0.01
Scold 0.32 (5.55) 0.17 (0.22) 0.47 (0.73) 0.060 3.67 0.05
Praise 0.26 (0.51) 0.22 (0.25) 0.30 (0.69) 0.874 0.02 0.00
Negative modeling 0.07 (0.17) 0.05 (0.11) 0.09 (0.22) 0.494 0.47 0.00
Punishment 0.05 (0.15) 0.07 (0.18) 0.03 (0.11) 0.119 2.49 0.03
Physical assistance 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 100 100 100

*Significant statistically differences in favor of coaches with university studies. **Significant statistically differences in favor of coaches without university studies.