Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 9;16(4):562–572. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.4.562

Table 2. Comparison of MS lesions with and without paramagnetic rims.

MS lesions with paramagnetic rims MS lesions without paramagnetic rims p
Number of patients 27 5 -
Sex, male:female 5:22 2:3 0.632
Age, years 30.0 [24.9–41.6] 40.5 [35.5–54.4] 0.098
Disease duration at first MRI scan, months 29.9 [1.3–63.6] 54.4 [47.3–66.2] 0.161
EDSS score at first MRI 1.5 [1.0–2.2] 2.0 [1.0–2.5] 0.832
Per-patient analysis
 Number of T2-weighted lesions 12 [7–16] 5 [5–12] 0.076
13.0±9.0 8.0±5.2 0.240
 Contrast-enhanced lesions 9/27 (33.3) 2/5 (40.0) 1.000
Per-MRI analysis
 Number of MRI scans 58 13
 Age, years 29.9 [24.8–39.7] 40.5 [27.4–54.4] 0.071
 Disease duration, months 33.1 [7.2–67.9] 49.9 [25.9–62.0] 0.624
 Disease-modifying therapy 42 (72.4) 8 (61.5) 0.660
 MRI scans in the acute phase of clinical attacks* 7 (12.1) 3 (23.1) 0.555

Data are mean±standard deviation, n (%), or median [interquartile range] values.

*Attacks in any location of the central nervous system, including the brain, optic nerve, or spinal cord.

EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, MS: multiple sclerosis.