Table 3.
Study ID | Source of informationa | Exclusion criteriab | Time periodc | Continuous or notd | Subjective factorse | Quality assessmentf | Explain exclusiong | Controlling confounding factorsh | Handling missing datai | Completeness of data collectionj | Follow-up datak | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Klein 2008 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | 6 |
Karesvuo 2013 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | 8 |
Wagley 2015 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | 8 |
Shin 2017 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | 8 |
a: define the source of information (survey, record review); b: list inclusion criteria for exposed and unexposed subjects (cases and controls) or refer to previous publications; c: indicate time period used for identifying patients; d: indicate whether or not subjects were consecutive if not population-based; e: indicate if evaluators of subjective components of the study were masked to other aspects of the status of the participants; f: describe any assessments undertaken for quality assurance purposes (e.g., test/retest of primary outcome measurements); g: explain any patient exclusions from analysis; h: describe how confounding factors were assessed and/or controlled; i: if applicable, explain how missing data were handled in the analysis; j: summarize patient response rates and completeness of data collection; k: clarify what follow-up was expected and the percentage of patients for which incomplete data or follow-up was obtained.