Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;5(11):1620–1627. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2585

Table 4.

Summary of current evidence, limitations, and future directions in exercise oncology

Current evidence
  • Observational data support an association between higher physical activity levels and lower risk of several cancers including colon, breast, kidney, endometrial, bladder, esophagus (adenocarcinoma), gastric (cardia), and lung.

  • Observational data support an association between increased post-diagnosis physical activity and lower disease-specific mortality for breast, colon, and prostate cancers.

  • Limited preclinical data support antitumor activity of exercise in murine or human models of cancer.

  • Data from RCTs support a benefit of exercise on patient reported outcomes and symptom control endpoints in cancer populations.

Limitations
  • Physical activity only assessed by self-report at a single time-point in observational studies.

  • A broad range of physical activity / exercise ‘doses’ associated witd reductions in primary cancer risk or cancer-related mortality.

  • Biological activity (e.g., effects on tumor or tumor microenvironment) not known.

  • Predictors of response (e.g., clinicopatdologic features, tumor subtype, genomic signatures) not known.

Future directions
  • Preclinical or “co-clinical” testing demonstrating modulation of tissue and tumor markers in relevant animal models

  • Conduct of early phase dose-finding / dose-escalation trials to identify feasible doses of exercise in the target population and setting (i.e., phase 1a)

  • Correlative science studies to examine biological activity of the identified feasible exercise doses.

  • Confirmation of feasibility and evaluation of preliminary antitumor efficacy in safety / dose-expansion (phase 1b) testing.

  • Determination of the recommended phase 2 dose based on feasibility and biological activity.